2011年3月20日 星期日

How to write a winning business plan

Anyone who has ever sought financing for their business from a financial institution knows that writing a business plan is a prerequisite to receiving any funding. To be considered for financing, most banks and other financial institutions such as venture capitalists will require a comprehensive and detailed business plan from which a thorough understanding of your existing or proposed business, your own goals and objectives and your financing requirements can be obtained.


Focus should be concentrated in some key areas, namely;


The business The entrepreneurs The market The financial management and planning The risks and rewards.


We can provide you with a general guide to writing a business plan but always bear in mind that every business is unique and each plan needs to be tailored accordingly.


All the same, no business plan would be considered complete without the following


A title page An executive summary Overview of the business Management The market Sales and marketing strategy Financial statements and projections Legal and regulatory environment Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and threats assessment (SWOT analysis) Supporting documentation


The Title Page


The title page should be short, precise and to the point. A good example would be'


"Funding Proposal For Acme Distributors Inc"


Thus, at first glance your banker or potential investor has a fairly good idea what the document you are handing them is all about.


Executive Summary


The most critical part of your business plan is the executive summary. Well written, it can win over a potential financier or investor without having to get into the 'nuts and bolts' which would normally be reserved for the rest of your plan.


It is a summary of the whole plan and captures the essence of what you have included in the various headings within the plan. The executive summary should be the last to write and it should be self explanatory without requiring the reader to refer to other pages of your business plan.


Overview


In the overview, you describe your business profile, products and/or services. In the profile, ensure that you include;


The background and history of the business The type of business e.g. proprietorship, partnership, Corporation e.t.c. The kind of business e.g. new, take over, expansion, franchise e.t.c. The mission, vision and values of the business, the long and short term objectives for business growth.


When describing your products and/or services be sure to include the following;


A full description of the products and or services you are offering or intend to offer. Simply stating, 'fast food caf' is not enough. You need to delve into details and include any unique features that give you a competitive edge over your competition. If you are in manufacturing, then you must include the product life cycle. Describe any key technologies that you use together with any current and future research and development Give a description of the location of the premises and where applicable, production facilities describe processes and capacity, identifying any existing constraints and possible problem areas include information on quality assurance systems and procedures, and certification


Management


Of particular concern for any financier or investor is how the business is being managed or is going to be managed. This is because human capital, more often than not, is responsible for making or breaking an enterprise. In this section you need to provide a detailed description of the ownership structure of the business. It is best to use a chart to do this. In summary be sure to include;


skills and experience of the entrepreneurs specific functions and responsibilities of each entrepreneur and/or manager a detailed resume of each entrepreneur the financial contribution of each entrepreneur to the business, and the current shareholding structure. The remuneration, incentives, share options, and terms of employment of key management and directors Any deficiencies in management and how these positions are to be filled current and future employment levels, labor relations and union membership details of systems to be implemented: information technology, accounting, administration, management information and stock control systems details of auditors, attorneys, bankers and professional advisers


The Market


In this section you need to analyze your market from two perspectives. An industry perspective and a customer perspective.


From an industry perspective, summarize the industry in which you will compete. You will obtain most facts from government websites and trade organizations. You will need to note;


current trends and developments in the industry important players in the industry industry segmentation industry issues e.g. high cost of raw materials national or global events influencing the industry or what we call the PEST factors (Political, Economic. Social and Technological factors) national and global growth forecasts effect of legislation


When analyzing your potential customers be sure to include;


a description of the existing market and growth potential a detailed analysis of the size, maturity, trends and seasonality a list of existing and potential customers, supported by letters of intent, orders on hand and contracts awarded, where applicable a detailed analysis of your competition, the price and quality of their products, service and delivery, and their expected reaction to your activities a demonstration of your competitive advantage


Sales And Marketing Strategy


This is basically a description of how you will deliver your product and/or your service to your targeted customers. You will need to elaborate on current and planned strategies specifically as regards; promotional activities, distribution, staffing, sales motivation and pricing.


Financial Statements And Projections


This is one area where most people get it wrong. It is advisable to seek the help of a CPA or use the numerous free resources on the internet to help you get the basics of financial statements right. Ensure that you include; Operating budgets, cash flow projections, income (profit and loss) statements for five years. For the first two years you can provide monthly projections, quarterly projections for the third year and annual projections for year four and five.


If your company is already operating, then you need to provide historical performance data from your last three audited financial statements.


Never fail to disclose the amount of loans, long or short term, that you hold. This information should include the outstanding amount, interest rate and bank(s) involved.


Finally, enumerate your capital requirements and explain how the sought funding shall be utilized.


Legal And Regulatory Environment


In this section you describe the laws and government regulations that affect and concern your business. You will also need to show that you have complied with all laws in your area of operation by attaching copies of any licenses, copyrights, trademarks, tax compliance certificates and so forth.


Swot Analysis


No business plan is complete without a discussion of definite and possible strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. You should provide an honest assessment of the risks faced and relate this to the potential for growth, profitability and capital appreciation. This is very important to an investor. Finally, suggest strategies that can mitigate the risk factors you have highlighted.


Supporting Documentation


While writing the business plan you will most likely find that you have used a number of information sources to provide data to back up the feasibility of your business e.g. you may have used data from a government website to show that demand for your product has steadily increased over the years. Where applicable ensure that you include the following documentation; newspaper clippings, promotional literature, product brochures, market research, trade and industry publications.


You may also need to provide supporting documentation for contracts awarded, letters of intent, orders, leases, memorandums, pro forma invoices, marriage certificates, life insurance policies and so forth. The bottom line is to back up any statements that require verification in your business plan.


(C) Copyright - Kimkay Kihara. All Rights Reserved Worldwide Kimkay is a freelance writer and researcher specializing in web content, articles, E-books and ghostwriting. You can find out more at Kreative Freelance Writing


A new era For internal auditors

??? 'Translate' ???????????????????? XML ????????????????? (8192)???? XML ?????? XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas ?????? MaxStringContentLength ??,????????? ? 1,?? 8757?
??? 'Translate' ???????????????????? XML ????????????????? (8192)???? XML ?????? XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas ?????? MaxStringContentLength ??,????????? ? 2,?? 9042?

The core of every internal control system is the integrity of its people, processes, and technologies. There is little debate that the U.S. financial crisis, caused by concurrent system failures, has had a global economic and political impact. In the wake of today's corporate scandals, bankruptcies, media-frenzied bailouts, and the financial market meltdown, light is once again being shed on the criticality of system risk and control over processes and technologies. However, more scrutiny is starting to be placed on the people who are responsible for governing and managing these systems. Because people are the most vital part of any system environment, it is imperative to have the right people - especially qualified internal auditors - in the right positions performing the right activities.

INTERNAL AUDITING AS THE CORPORATE CONSCIENCE

"Risk Governance is about three things: understanding the limits of acceptable risk, providing confidence and guidance to management, and anticipating events to set yourself up for success,"said Admiral William J. Fallon (United States Navy, Retired), co-chair of the Blue Ribbon Commission on Risk Governance, in a Commission report, Balancing Risk and Reward. In today's economic climate, the concept of governance and risk management must evolve from mere written principles into robust practices within board and management processes. The IIA's International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (Standards) defines the role of internal auditing in governance in Standard 2110 - Governance: "The internal audit activity must assess and make appropriate recommendations for improving the governance process in its accomplishment of the following objectives:

- Promoting appropriate ethics and values within the organization.

- Ensuring effective organizational performance management and accountability.

- Communicating risk and control information to appropriate areas of the organization.

- Coordinating the activities of and communicating information among the board, external and internal auditors, and management.

With respect to ethics, the internal audit function is generally expected to serve as the corporate conscience. Therefore, the posture of the internal audit function must be such that it can influence the corporate "brain," which encompasses members of the board and management who are the keepers of the organization (i.e., "body") and trusted guardians of its well-being. As the corporate conscience, internal auditing must be prepared to have open, candid, and constructive dialogues with their boards and management to not only comply with the Standards, but also to balance the scale between the organization's financial and ethical performance.

One of the more sensitive challenges internal audit executives are confronting is how to bring transparency to the board and management's personal values, which are an essential part in establishing the integrity and core values of an enterprise. While the public sector continues to bring board and management transparency to the forefront of the reform agenda, there will likely be more focus on personal transparency among board members and management. The internal audit activity should recognize and consider this "inner" transparency when assessing governance structures and processes, and promoting appropriate ethics and values within the organization.

PREPARING FOR THE CHALLENGE

Internal auditors have an important role and must be educated and trained to effectively carry out their responsibilities. An educated and skilled auditor should be able to filter out the noise and sift down to what information is relevant, reliable, and sufficient to support the reasoning for timely decisions and actions. The new generation of internal audit professionals must strive to become as wise as the board, as savvy as management, as intelligent as the lawyers, as diligent as the accountants, and as precise as the statisticians. Most notably, internal auditors must exercise fair and ethical judgment.

Historically, there have not been regulatory requirements for internal auditing standards or certification requirements for its professionals. At this time, it is unlikely that a regulatory rule would enforce definitive quality or certification standards; however, it is critical that education and training programs are implemented to improve the effectiveness of the internal audit function. These programs will improve the capabilities of the company's internal watchdogs to help identify and respond to risks that threaten the health and vitality of the organization and its economic ecosystem.

Although there are a variety of audit-related certifications available, some are more notable than others. For example, The IIA's Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) designation, which has been earned by approximately 80,000 internal auditors worldwide, is The Institute's flagship certification and the standard by which individuals demonstrate their overall competence and professionalism in internal auditing. While other certifications touch on specific areas of specialization, the CIA certification covers the broader range of knowledge that internal auditors need to know. "Becoming a CIA enhances your overall skills in internal auditing, establishes your credentials, and demonstrates your commitment to the internal audit profession," says Angie Woodward, CIA, CCSA, CGAP, CFSA, IIA director of certification. "Even for individuals who are not planning to stay in internal auditing long term, earning the CIA can still add value to their careers by preparing them to meet a variety of management challenges."

In addition to the CIA, The IIA offers three specialized certifications:

Certified Government Auditing Professional (CGAP). This designation demonstrates an individual's knowledge of the unique features of public-sector auditing - fund accounting, grants, legislative oversight, and confidentiality rights. The program's broad scope emphasizes the auditor's role in strengthening accountability to the public and improving government services.

Certified Financial Services Auditor (CFSA). The CFSA measures an individual's knowledge of, and proficiency in, audit principles and practices within the banking, insurance, and securities financial services industries.

Certification in Control Self-Assessment (CCSA). This certification is designed for practitioners of control self-assessment (CSA). Gaining the required knowledge of areas such as risk and control models - often considered the realm of auditors only - exposes CSA practitioners to concepts that are vital in effectively using CSA to help clients achieve their objectives.

Other specialized certification programs also are available to internal auditors. The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners' (ACFEs') Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) credential denotes proven expertise in fraud prevention, detection, and deterrence. According to ACFE, CFEs have a unique set of skills that combine knowledge of complex financial transactions with an understanding of methods, law, and how to resolve allegations of fraud. Fraud examiners also are trained to understand not only how fraud occurs, but also why it occurs. Approximately 20,000 anti-fraud professionals have obtained their CFE credential. The Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) offers the Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) certification, which is a globally recognized achievement for those who control, monitor, and assess an organization's IT and business systems. More than 70,000 professionals have earned the CISA since its inception in 1978.

Although internal audit certification currently is not mandatory, audit-related acronyms are starting to find their way into the boardroom to help directors and management set standards to measure the competency and qualifications of those professionals responsible for safeguarding the corporate conscience.

LOOKING TO THE FUTURE

While we continue to endure the challenges of these tough economic times, it is important to recognize that government regulation will cause various degrees of change to governance and internal control systems. Those organizations that recognize this will not only be prepared to respond to these changes, but also will be better positioned to sustain focus on strategic operations that create value for stakeholders. As companies embrace this ideology, we will continue to see the trend of increased audit-related certification as a means for organizations to evaluate and measure internal control excellence and maintain a healthy existence.








Michael Brozzetti, CIA, CISA, CGEIT, is president of Boundless LLC, a Philadelphia-based firm specializing in applying audit, compliance, and forensic methods to enhance the overall health and well-being of organizations. He is a member of the IIA-Philadelphia chapter and serves as an adjunct professor with Villanova University where he instructs an internal audit review course.

MICHAEL BROZZETTI, CIA, CISA, CGEIT
PRESIDENT
BOUNDLESS LLC
http://www.boundlessllc.com


Cirencester's 20 mph speed limit zone broadening

plans to extend the existing 20 mph speed limit for many more routes in Cirencester.

Gloucestershire county Council said the system would help to improve the quality of life for residents and improve road safety.


It said Watermoor road would be extra traffic-calming measures installed.


-Emergency services, road haulage association and local advisers have been consulted and has given its support, said a spokesman.


"Speed cushions in three places and build-outs to narrow carriageway in Watermoor Road," he said.


"This combined with the current arrangements for parking will reduce speed and improve safety.


"Anyone who wants to comment on the proposals should contact Gloucestershire Highways Department no later than March 17," Council spokesman.


View the original article here

2011年3月19日 星期六

You can be a Cruise ship's owner, even if you're not RICH TEXT

Unlike fractional ownership of aircraft and houseboats, fractional owners of a cruise ship can all use the ship simultaneously. There is plenty of room for you and the other owners to live on the ship any time you want, or all the time. You can use it as a full-time residence, and so can the other co-owners.


The first obvious benefit of shared ownership is acquisition cost. There are many cruise ships on the market in all price ranges, sizes, ages, and conditions. There are many smaller and older cruise ships available for less than one million dollars. At the lower end, some smaller cruise ships in fair condition can be acquired for about $250,000. At the highest end, the biggest new mega cruise ships now cost about $500 million to build.


Do the math. If one hundred buyers pool resources in exchange for a percentage of ship ownership, the acquisition cost will be divided by that same number. One percent ownership of a $250,000 cruise ship would cost a mere $2500 for ship acquisition. At the other end of the scale, one percent ownership of a brand new mega cruise ship would cost five million dollars.


There are some other figures that must be tabulated into the total cost of ownership. Acquisition cost is first and foremost. The next figure is the cost to put the ship in service. On an older ship this cost may be higher than the acquisition cost. On the other hand, the cost to put a ship into service can be much lower if you were to get a good deal on a ship that already meets the international standards for ship safety, especially SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea). Maintaining compliance with Chapter II SOLAS 74 amendments is cost prohibitive for some older ships and they are typically scrapped instead of being refurbished at great expense. There is a very important SOLAS implementation date coming up on January 10, 2010. On that date all commercial international ships will be required to be in compliance with the new fire safety codes. The most important new codes deal with the use of combustible materials in the ship. It will be expensive to replace all combustible materials in ships with non-combustible or flame resistant SOLAS compliant materials that meet the new safety standards. This will result in many ships being sold for scrap metal.


The looming SOLAS 2010 implementation date offers both perils and opportunities. The biggest peril is the possibility that the expense to bring a ship into full compliance with international standards will be greater than the value of the ship. However, there is a silver lining in this cloud. This pending SOLAS implementation date has already started to show up as a primary factor in the asking and selling prices of ships on the market today.


SOLAS 2010 also offers a tremendous opportunity for those who may prefer to have a very large houseboat instead of a commercial ship. Ships that are not in compliance with SOLAS 2010 are now selling for a song (inexpensively). A cruise ship can easily be converted into a megayacht with the stroke of a pen. Privately owned yachts, not in commercial service, and not carrying passengers or cargo for hire are exempt from many of the SOLAS requirements. Operating costs are also lower for a private yacht. It cost less to register, flag, and insure a private yacht. Megayachts can be flagged and classified for unlimited service. That means that a megayacht can go practically anywhere you want it to go. There is one major drawback to registering a cruise ship as a private yacht. You cannot use the yacht commercially. This cuts off a potential revenue source.


There are many decent cruise ships for sale at prices of less than one million dollars that would make good private megayachts. For example, take the 'VERGINA SKY' is a ship that I have personally inspected and so I can talk first hand about it. The asking price was $750,000. Here are the specifics of the ship in a nutshell:


Current Name: Vergina Sky


Ship Details: Built: 1971 in Japan - totally rebuilt 1992 in Greece


Dimensions: LOA 97.8m x LBP 82m x beam 14.6m x draft 4.49m Dwt: 500 on 4,49 GT/NT: 4,668 / 1,717


Description: Pielstick 2 x 8400bhp, twin screw, bow thruster, 3 x 500kw generators, 16 knots, 2 saloons, restaurant, 3 bars, casino, duty free shop, disco, swimming pool, 120 cabins for 318 guests. Lying Greece


My Comments after inspecting the ship


This is a well built little 'Pocket Cruiser.' At just over 320' in length overall, it is a small cruise ship. Many experienced cruise passengers prefer smaller more intimate cruise ships for a variety of reasons. This ship can go places where the big cruise ships cannot reach, such as shallow draft ports and even many rivers. It has an omni-directional bow thruster and can turn on a dime (relatively speaking of course). I have carefully examined this ship from the engine log to the ultrasound hull report. This is a sound and safe little cruise ship. It is also a very fuel efficient and economical ship. My first time on this ship was in the middle of the summer in Greece when it was very hot outside. The ship is fully air conditioned and it was cool and comfortable inside the ship. I checked the engine room to see how many generators were running. I am happy to report that all the electric and air-conditioning requirements can be met by running just one of the three Daihatsu generators. These generators are very economical to operate in terms of fuel consumption and maintenance.


I was able to negotiate with the owner, John Kosmas and get some concessions. I got the price down to $500,000. And at that price, he agreed to bring the ship into compliance with SOLAS 2005 and also to include new paint topside. The ship was fairly well furnished even including bed linen, but the ship had been laid up for years. Its most recent service was in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. Cruise ships that trade exclusively in the Mediterranean and Black Seas tend to have smaller cabins and fewer amenities than the typical cruise ships that frequent the Caribbean. The bottom line is that this ship was an economy model, not a luxury model. When I was inspecting the engine room, I asked for the engine log. When I opened it I noticed all the entries were in Greek. I was able to discern some dates and other data that told me when the ship was last in service, but I could not read the Greek entries so I handed the engine log back to the ship owner, and told him "It's all Greek to me." Being Greek, Mr. Kosmas failed to find the humor in that.


Let's look at the numbers on this ship. 100% of the acquisition cost would have been $500,000. 1% thus = $5000. One hundred buyers could own one percent each. There are 120 cabins so each co-owner could have a private cabin with 20 cabins left over. However, these cabins are a bit on the small side. Every cabin does have a bath and shower, but the size is just too small to be comfortable for most people, especially if the owners intend to live onboard full time. On a ship this size I would recommend that there be no more than 60 joint owners so each can have two cabins and will have the option of converting those two cabins into a two room suite. To keep the numbers simple lets say that this ship has 50 buyers who each buy 2% of the ship. Buy in cost per owner would then be $10,000. If there were only ten buyers, then the acquisition cost per buyer would be $50,000. $50,000 will not buy much of a house on land, but on this ship it would buy 10% of a ship like the Vergina Sky and twelve cabins that could be converted into a fairly large home.


At the economy end of the scale, a co owner could buy 1% of an economical cruise ship for about $5000. However it is not necessary for all co owners to have equal shares in the ship. Ownership can easily be divided up into 1% increments. If one buyer wanted 5%, then his cost of acquisition would be $25,000. He would be entitled to 5% of the ship's cabins, and would have five votes on operations and management of the ship, such as itinerary planning.


Before becoming a joint owner, it would be imperative to find other people who have similar goals. I would suggest composing a preliminary DCCR (DECLARATION OF
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS). You can do this before you even shop for a ship. Write your version of how you envision the shared ownership of a cruise ship as it should be. Then see if you can find some people who agree with your goals and your DCCR, subject to some revisions and concessions to accommodate other joint owners.


Step One: Determine if you and your family have the desire and financial capability to become joint cruise ship (or megayacht) owners.


Step Two: Find others who agree with your concept for shared ownership of a ship.


Step Three: Shop for a ship. This is the fun part.


Step Four: Buy a ship.


Step Five: Put the ship into service.


Even if you are not rich, you can afford to jointly own a cruise ship. But then comes the next logical question: Why would you or anyone want to live on a cruise ship? Who would this be suitable for?


If you are retired or otherwise have a stable income from a dependable source you probably can afford to be a cruise ship co-owner and live full-time onboard a cruise ship. If you work in a field where you can work from home online, then you too can probably afford to become a co-owner of a cruise ship. Most modern ships have satellite Internet service available 24-7.


Operating a cruise ship is expensive. The expenses include the cost of fuel, labor, maintenance, repairs, spares, food, port charges, insurance, technical management, shore management, registration, and the other costs of operating the ship. At first glance these costs may seem expensive, but in reality the cost of living at sea is actually a bargain considering what you get based upon what you pay. The best value does not always translate to the cheapest price. If the ship is well managed, the management will seek the highest quality goods, services, and labor at the very best global value. If the owners are dissatisfied with either technical or shore management, they replace them.


If there are many other co-owners of the ship to split the operating expenses of the ship, it can be affordable for those with a moderate level of income, such as a retirement check. I do have specific operating cost figures but I won't bore you with that data. The bottom line is that it would not be prohibitively expensive for a middle-class average person to be able to afford to own a fraction of a cruise ship and be able to afford to live on the cruise ship full-time if they elect to do so.


For comparison purposes it is noteworthy that you have expenses in land based housing too. Those expenses include property taxes, homeowners insurance, maintenance and repairs, yard care, and utilities. Additionally you have transportation costs and of course food costs. Most people also spend money on entertainment too. When these expenses are added up the maintenance fees for living aboard a ship are comparable.


There are actually some savings resulting from living aboard a ship. The ship's executive chef buys food and kitchen supplies in bulk for the ship and can get better prices than the average shopper. Other savings result from the large freezers and the mobility of the ship giving the food service management the ability to stock up on supplies in countries where prices are low. Some crew and owners may choose to fish for leisure. This can supply some fresh food at even lower costs to the owners. Labor savings are realized when the crew is hired based upon the best global labor rates. The laws of supply and demand drive prices down in some places in the world. Proper ship management can capitalize on these disparities. All the savings would be passed on to the cabin owners resulting in an economical cost of living similar to what you could expect to spend with a conventional home. Ship management should have accounting transparency will all books (financial records) open and available for any owner to inspect. Also ship management should submit all financial records quarterly to an outside auditor for the peace of mind of the owners. Anybody in the chain who spends any of the ship's operational funds should also be periodically audited. For example, a good way to audit the executive chef would be for one or more of the live-aboard co-owners of the ship to go to the food market district of each port of call and they should try to haggle and get a better price for the same food than the price the executive chef was able to acquire. If the executive chef cannot find better deals than the ship's co-owners, then the executive chef should be given his walking papers. The executive chef position is a vital position on a cruise ship. This is a position of trust because he will bill the food he buys to the ship. He must never be tempted to accept bribes from vendors or suppliers. Therefore, he should know that he will be routinely audited and any substandard performance will result in termination of his employment.


The biggest value of all onboard cruise ship is in labor costs. The better cruise ships tend to be labor intensive, providing passengers with unrelenting attention and extravagant pampering. The hotel staff on all cruise ships provides the basic services including food preparation and serving, laundry, cabin stewarding, entertainment, casino operation, beauty shop operations, This is one area where I would prefer to not scrimp because of the very good value in these services due to the low cost of international labor. I would prefer to go beyond the level that most cruise ships go in the area of spas. Land based luxury and specialty resort spas are very expensive, but the exact same level of service, professionalism, skill, and treatments can be provided on a cruise ship at extremely low cost. Labor is the key and the primary reason for most of the expense of spas. Labor is a tremendous value on a cruise ship because the cruise ship managers can choose workers from the global marketplace where it is easy to get the best value for the money.


Spas


Spa treatment is customized for each client. Spas commonly offer services such as:


Soothing massage therapies, skin and body treatments drawing from European and Eastern principles, expert hair and nail services, and a full menu of therapeutic treatments utilizing a deep-cleansing facial at the start of the program, as well as a series of detoxification and contouring wraps, lypo-reduction wrap, as well as marine mud and herb wraps. Massage Therapies including: Swedish Massage, Shiatsu Massage, Deep Tissue Treatment, Maternity Massage, Therapeutic Foot Massage (Reflexology), French Hydrotherapy Massage.


The healing therapies include a variety of massages, reflexology, facials, firming and many other body treatments. Plus a wide variety of services and wellness programs specially designed to meet the individual's needs and desires. A full service salon offers all manner of hair treatments (including a certified colorist), as well as a variety of manicures, pedicures, and 'facelifts' for your hands. Extensive skin care includes: Age Management Therapies including, Glycolic Facial, Anti-Aging Facial Peel, Microdermabrasion; Facials including: Aromaplasty Facial, Teen Facial, Gentleman's Facial, Nutrisource Facial, Regulating Acne Facial, Vitamin "C" Skin Renewal Facial; Body Treatments including: Decleor Sauna Mask, French Hydrotherapy Massage, Andromeda Salt Glow, Mummy Mud Mask, Seaweed Body Wrap, Safe Sun Treatment, Herbal Wrap; as well as various hair and nail treatments.


Additionally, spas also can facilitate weight reduction programs, and even administer physical therapy. In short, you can be treated like a king, on the budget of a pauper.


Labor Costs - International competition provides the most value to the ship owners.


On paper it seems to make good sense to man the ship with a Philippine crew. I love the Philippines. I have been there several times. English is still widely spoken and usually spoken quite well. The people are usually friendly and happy to see foreign tourists. A large percentage of ships worldwide are manned by crews from the Philippines. The Philippine government has a pretty good structure and system to facilitate the export of Philippine labor. In spite of how attractive it seems on paper, I would recommend NOT hiring a crew from the Philippines. Philippine workers tend to be envious of others, and especially of everybody else's wages. They tend to think they are getting the raw end of the deal. It is rare to find a Filipino who is happy with his employment. While I am sure there are many good employees from the Philippines, there are more who are dissatisfied than satisfied with their employment. There seems to be a cultural anomaly in the Philippines where people feel that employers are bad guys. I would hesitate to recommend a crew from the Philippines in spite of the apparent advantages on paper.


My recommendation (for what it is worth)


I do know something about what I am writing about here. I am the former President of Adventure Spa Cruise. My advice is not just uninformed ranting. Back to the point now, the second best manning nation for a ship is India. I highly recommend India for the medical staff and the entire hotel staff, including the spa, and every other position except the deck and engineering. The labor costs in India are very attractive. I would also recommend using an Indian based manning agency. It is best if the ship's owners do not have to deal with every employee issue or concern. The manning agency takes the pressure off the ship's management, and their service is very reasonable. Indian employees tend to make better employees than do Filipinos. Indians also speak English, albeit not quite as well as Filipinos. I know Americans tend to get all worked up when someone uses a broad brush to paint an entire ethnicity. I love the people from the Philippines, but as employees they tend to be more problematic than do Indian employees. I realize that this statement is politically incorrect, and these days that might get me thrown in jail. I usually do not worry so much about being politically correct. I call it the way I see I and I let the cards fall where they may, and hope I can stay out of jail for speaking my mind.


All deck and engineering positions should be filled with an all Ukrainian crew. The ship will realize the most value for the money with Ukrainian deck and engineering staff. The Ukraine has a long maritime history and tradition. Maritime training and standards in the Ukraine are among the best in the world. Ukrainian deck and engineering staff are as good as or better than any other, but the cost of their labor is a very good value. The labor for deck officer and engineering staff are governed by international agreements, including STCW (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers).


Putting a cruise ship into service


After acquiring the ship, it will require some more investment to put it into service. At this point the joint owners will need to reach some agreements on many points. The cost of putting a cruise ship into service as a megayacht (very large private yacht) is much less than putting the ship into commercial service. However, if you can afford to buy a ship can easily meet SOLAS 2010 requirements, and can afford to flag and register it as a commercial ship then you can use the ship commercially to produce income and ROI (return on investment).


There are many marketing options for a commercial cruise ship. If the owners use no more than half the cabins, then that will leave sufficient means to produce enough revenue to at least pay for operating costs, and possibly produce a profit above operating costs. I will just briefly touch on some of the options available for marketing cruise ship capacity.


1. Conventional cruises. There is a trade-off here. You can produce revenue by providing conventional cruises. This will require that the ship have an itinerary that suits the commercial cruising market.


2. Freight and cargo. Some cruise ships have enough cargo capacity to produce some revenue by booking freight.


3. Assisted living. A cruise ship is well suited for assisted living, including crew and facilities. The going rate for assisted living in the average city in America is higher than the average cost of a cruise of the same duration.


4. Timeshares. This is an option not available to conventional cruise ship operators but could be facilitated if your co-owners agree to this type of marketing to fill cabins not used by co-owners. I will not go into the figures here, but timeshares tend to be high profit sales. There is a good chance that if the joint owners use no more than half the ship's cabins for their own personal use, the remaining cabins could easily produce more than the total amount all the joint owners combined have invested.


Ships that would easily meet SOLAS 2010 tend to cost a bit more money to buy up front, and cost more to put into service. So I will give you couple of examples.


The Orient Venus is one of my favorite high-end ships. The specs:


M/V ORIENT VENUS


BUILT: JULY 1990 AT I.H.I.TOKYO


JAPANESE FLAG


JG. NK OCEAN GOING


GRT: 21,884 TONS


DWT: 4,863 TONS ON 6.50 M


LOA x B x D : 174.0x24.0x8.7 M


M/ENG: DIESEL UNITED-12PC2-6V x 2 SETS ,


TWIN SCREW CPP


SPEED: SERVICE ABT21.0 KNOTS / ABT 56.70MT /D


FUEL TANKS CAPA: IFO 1,500.4 M3 /MDO 87.30M3


GENERATOR: 1,600KWxAC450Vx60HZx 3 SETS


ENGINE ROOM M0 SYSTEMS


CRUISING RANGE: ABT 7,000MILE


PASSENGERS: MAX 606 PERSONS


CREW: 120 PERSONS


ABA WOG


DELIVERY: BY ARRANGEMENT


INSPECTION : KOBE.JAPAN


OWNERS PRICE USD 22 MIL net here


My personal assessment of the Orient Venus


It is a late model and beautiful ship. It has many highly desirable attributes for a residential ship. It is a high end luxury cruise ship with an extraordinarily high tonnage to passenger ratio. This is very important for a residential ship. More living room and more space per passenger is far more essential for a residential ship than for a conventional cruise ship. When passengers are only on a ship for a short time, they can tolerate cramped living quarters, but when they live year-round on a ship, the extra space is quite valuable. The owners have been trying to sell this ship for $22,000,000. That may seem like a high price, but when you divide it by the number of cabins (195) the asking price per cabin is $102,564. This price is in line with what you would expect to pay for a condominium. The last word I got from the owners is that they will sell the ship for $18,000,000 now ($92,307 per cabin). The cabins are all "outside" cabins and are large. The ship can accommodate 606 passengers and a crew of 120, for a total of 726 people.


Several ship brokers have this ship listed. I usually do not talk to ship brokers. I prefer to talk directly with the ship owners. I am in contact with the owners of the Orient Venus. I could probably get this stunningly beautiful ship for less than $15,000,000 today, and get some concessions and extras thrown in to boot.


Another example of a high end ship that would make do well as a commercial cruise ship, plus accommodate a hundred or so full-time live aboard co-owners is the Dream Princess, originally named Song of Norway.


GRT: 22,945


Max Draft: 6.7 M in sea water


Length: 194 M.


Total No. of Cabins: 538


Total No. Of Beds + Berth: 1280


Outside Cabins: 346


Inside Cabins: 192


Cabins size range: SQ. M: 11 -18.


Main Engines: 4 Wartsila Sulzer - 18,000 HP.


Service Speed: 16 Knots.


Public Rooms:


Main Dinning room - "King & I"- about 500 pax.


South Pacific Lounge about 400 pax.


My Fair Lady Lounge about 500 pax.


Bars- 5


Self Service Restaurant on the swimming pool deck


Large Swimming pool


Disco


Casino


Duty Free Shops


Gym


8 passenger decks


extensive outdoor areas


Ship was redecorated / refurbished extensively during 2005.


The asking price on this ship is $31 million USD. Divide the asking price by the number of cabins and the average cost per cabin would be $57,620. Of course some cabins are better than others so co-owners would have to agree of the shared usage before agreeing to the purchase.


I have some bad news for the ship owners and some good news for you. This ship will not sell for the asking price.


Fuel


Ship fuel is cheaper than automobile fuel for a few reasons. There are no road taxes on ship fuel of course and also it is different fuel. Ships main engines usually run on IFO180 or IFO380. Generator engines tend to be more finicky and commonly require diesel (MDO), which is still cheaper than automotive diesel. IFO 180 and 380 costs much less than MDO, usually about half the price. Ships consume a lot of fuel. So fuel cost is a major concern. I have some suggestions. If I were a co-owner of a ship I would be willing to invest a little more in the ship to increase fuel efficiency, and thus lower operating costs. There are many things that can be done to increase fuel efficiency. I would start with hull resistance. There is a new silicone-based paint from International Paints that when applied to the hull reduces amount of resistance in the water sufficiently to result in a 3 to 5% decrease in fuel consumption. A similar coating for the propellers also has been proven to increase fuel efficiency.
In addition to hull and prop coatings, there is an even more promising way to achieve dramatic fuel savings.


There is a company called Kiteship that has developed and produces kites for racing sailboats. These sailing kites do not require a mast. The kites fly high above the vessel, attached by cable and controlled from the vessel. Dave Culp of Kiteship has done a technical feasibility study on fitting a very large kite onto a conventional cruise ship. This would dramatically reduce fuel consumption. It would convert a fuel guzzler to a "green machine." This is tantamount to converting a powerboat into a sail boat. The design of a cruise ship limits the amount of sail that a conventional ship can safely accommodate. A cruise ship lacks the ballast of a sail boat. If used in addition to the main engine(s) the kite will increase fuel efficiency. If the kite is used to pull the ship with the main engines shut down the ship's speed will be reduced substantially. However, in this case, not only would the ship save IFO (main engine fuel) but also save MDO (generator engine fuel). If the kite were pulling the ship unassisted by the ship's engines, then the propellers could be used to propel the ship's generators without firing up the diesel generator engines. Even if the ship were traveling very slowly in the water, the propellers would turn in reverse if freed from the main engines. This is a very simple and easy task for the ship's engineer to accomplish. In other words, the ship can be pulled by the kite, and that motion will push the ship's propellers providing power to produce electricity and power the air-conditioning without using any fuel. The trade-off is a loss of speed and also some tacking is required, further reducing actual speed. What's the rush? Why not go for maximum fuel savings? The salient point is that a high flying large kite can pull a cruise ship. If I were a co-owner of a cruise ship I would hope to find like minded co-owners who would be receptive to using such state-of-the-art technologies to save fuel.


There are hundreds of cruise ships on the market but I will just mention one more here. This cruise ship has RO/RO (Roll-On, Roll-Off) capability. This would be very convenient for live aboard owners who want to bring their "toys" with them. The garage deck will accommodate 6 to 8 trucks, or 60 to 80 cars. That converts to a lot of co-owner toys such as motorhomes, travel trailers, campers, cabin cruisers, ski boats, jet skis, sailboats, houseboats, bass boats, motorcycles, ATVs, cars, and trucks.


Specifications:


650 PASSENGER CRUISE SHIP FOR SALE


VESSEL IS FULLY FITTED WITH SPRINKLERS


SOLAS 2005/2010 FITTED


TWIN SCREW CRUISE


VESSEL DIMENSIONS LOA 137.10 X BREADTH 21.00 X 5.8 METERS DRAFT


BUILT 1981 / POLAND


REBUILT 1991


REBUILT - UPGRADED 1999


REBUILT - RENOVATED - REFURBISHED 2002


CLASS R.S. ICE CLASS L2


GRT 12637


PASSENGERS 650 IN 230 CABINS (BASIS 3 BERTH OCCUPANCY)


ALL CABINS WITH PRIVATE FACILITIES (INCLUDING SUITES AND SEMI SUITES)


9 DECKS


HELICOPTER PAD


MAIN ENGINES SULZER 4 X 4,350 BHP


SPEED ABOUT 17.5 / 15 KNOTS ON ABOUT 45 / 36 M/TONS + 9 TONS DIESEL OIL


BOWTHRUSTER 800 BHP


STABILIZERS


120 TONS PER DAY WATER MAKER


RECEPTION


LOUNGE


RESTAURANT (420 SEATS)


NINE BARS


CASINO


DUTY FREE SHOP


CHILDREN'S PLAY ROOM - TWO DISCOS


TV/MOVIE CORNER


DUTY FREE SHOPS


HAIRDRESSING SHOP


JACUZZI


ONE PASSENGER ELEVATOR


LAUNDRY SPA & HEALTH CLUB


TWO SAUNAS


CLINIC


TWO SWIMMING POOLS (ADULT & CHILDREN)


Cost per cabin based on asking price, $71,739. This ship will sell for less than asking price. It is already SOLAS 2010 compliant. It would cost very little to put into commercial service.


Conclusion


Becoming a co-owner of a cruise ship is not a far fetched idea. It is practical and feasible if you are able to find like minded people who would be willing to share the expenses.


The author, Arthur Wyss is a resident of Beijing, China. He specializes in immigration assistance for those who wish to live in Brazil. He also operates Brazil Land Sales, which primarily sells land in the State of Tocantins, Brazil. He is the former President of Adventure Spa Cruise. His website is: http://www.brazil-land-sales.com/index.htm

EtQ CEO to Webinar in the integrated management system of quality and compliance of GFSI standards

EtQ is pleased to announce that it would submit its seminar, "GFSI standards and the quality of integrated management system", the Wednesday March 9 at 1: 00 pm EST.


Led by CEO Glenn McCarty of the EtQ, this seminar details how have changed the methods of monitoring of compliance over the years, such as the evolution of books written by hand to point solutions, solutions of automation of the company.


"The evolution of our business systems has led a challenge to get a holistic view and having transparency which is a necessity in GFSI compliance initiatives," said McCarty. "In this seminar we will discuss the challenges they face to create a comprehensive solution through integration and consolidation of business systems." "We will also detail how to combine quality processes and GFSI in one integrated system promotes efficiency, and how risk management can be used to help an organization to prioritize the risk by effectively filter and sort data."


For more information or to register on this free seminar, visit us on the Web at https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/974724953.


About EtQ
EtQ is the leading enterprise quality and compliance management software for identification, mitigation and prevention of high risk through integration, automation and collaboration events. EtQ uses best in its class, embedded modules and the integration of business applications to manage and measure the quality and compliance processes and implement organizational changes. Key modules in the product include HACCP, corrective and measures preventive (CAPA), audits, complaint management, risk management, change management, Control documents, training employees, management of projects, protesters materials, Enterprise Reporting, and more than 20 additional oriented in compliance modules. With its first class flexible workflow, collaboration platform, EtQ has developed a unique niche support to companies involved in various initiatives management of compliance with rules such as: HACCP, SQF, BRC, IFS, as 9001, ISO 13485ISO 9001: 2008, ISO/TS 16949, ISO 14001, ISO 22000GMP (FDA), TL 9000, OHSAS 18001, RoHS, Sarbanes-Oxley and similar rules for compliance with rules and regulations management. EtQ has been providing solutions in compliance with rules for a variety of markets for more than 15 years.


For more information or to schedule a virtual demonstration, please contact EtQ Inc., at 800-354-4476 or 516-293-0949, or send us an email to info (at) etq (dot) com. visit EtQ in http://www.etq.com.


EtQ is a registered trademark of EtQ Management Consultants, Inc. All other product names and company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.


###



View the original article here

2011年3月18日 星期五

EtQ Technology Director to speak at the annual quality management division Conference 23

EtQ, Inc., is pleased to announce that its technical director, Morgan Palmer, will speak on the 23 Conference of the Division for management of annual quality (QMD) to be held from March 17 through 18thth in Orlando, Florida.

Farmingdale, NY (Vocus/PRWEB) March 03, 2011

EtQ, Inc., is pleased to announce that its technical director, Morgan Palmer, will speak on the 23 Conference of the Division for management of annual quality (QMD) to be held from March 17 through 18thth in Orlando, Florida.

Palmer will present the theme "Bridging the Gap between PLM and change management," at 2: 10 pm on Friday, March 18.

"Change management is a crucial part of the product life cycle," said Palmer. "Within any organization, the change is necessary to ensure continuous improvement;" change management is a critical process. "This session will examine how the functionality of a robust QMS is ideal for the management of change due to the quality is linked throughout the lifecycle of the product, starting in design and through to production, selection of suppliers and post production."

EtQ will also be present at the Conference Division of quality management. For more information or to see a demonstration, please visit us on the Web at http://www.etq.com.

About the Division of quality management Conference
The 23rd Conference of Division for management of quality, "Excellence through people, process and performance", will offer many learning opportunities for attendees to participate in a variety of forums, pre-Conference courses, presentations, lectures and interactive sessions. ASQ certification exams will take place on Saturday, March 19, just after the Conference concludes.

About EtQ
EtQ is the leading enterprise quality and compliance management software for identification, mitigation and prevention of high risk through integration, automation and collaboration events. EtQ uses best in its class, embedded modules and the integration of business applications to manage and measure the quality and compliance processes and implement organizational changes. Key modules in the product include the management of risks, corrective and preventive measures (layer), Control of documents, audits, HACCP, complaint management, change management, training to employees, management of projects, protesters materials, Enterprise Reporting, and more than 20 additional modules oriented in compliance with standards. With its first class flexible workflow, collaboration platform, EtQ has developed a unique niche support to companies involved in various initiatives of administration of compliance with standards as cGxP (FDA), ISO 13485, ISO 9001: 2008, ISO/TS 16949ISO 14001, ISO 22000, AS 9001, 18001 9000OHSAS TL, RoHS, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, HACCP, SQF, BRC, IFS and similar rules for compliance with rules and regulations management. EtQ has been providing solutions in compliance with rules for a variety of markets for more than 15 years.

For more information or to schedule a virtual demonstration, please contact EtQ Inc., at 800-354-4476 or 516-293-0949 or send us an email to info (at) etq (dot) com. visit us on the Web at http://www.etq.com.

EtQ is a registered trademark of EtQ Management Consultants, Inc. All other product names and company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.

###

Angela Lodico
EtQ, Inc.
800-354-4476 43
Information from e-mail


View the original article here

ISO 9001-myths (part II)


When I discuss with clients (or potential customers) their ISO 9001 certification needs, I try to mentally keep a log of every time I hear something completely "off point." My biggest problem is that this is done so on a regular basis, I have a difficult time keeping track. To a standard that is only around 35 pages long and all things not considered terrible prescriptive in detail, there seems to be an awful lot of misinformation around.

So here we are again, to deal with a few more "myths" about ISO 9001 standard and its requirements:

1. ISO 9001 certification is animal-what is expensive? I do not want to say this will be free but individual perceptions of "the animal" away from, to achieve ISO 9001 certification can be done at a reasonable price and very often costs far outweighed by the benefits of certification brings (e.g. fewer audits, customer eligibility for new contracts, third-party recognition, etc.). The projects we have all heard about those who have been really "animal," is usually a result of poor project management, inappropriate, or "blind alley" implementation and by means of predatory pricing consultants who just maximize their hourly billing.

2. Certification takes years-to achieve ISO 9001 certification takes a while, but if you are committed to success and has all of the resource you need to, there is a light at the end of the tunnel; If you still do not make any progress after several months, is probably incorrect. Just as the cost is a relative term and susceptible to the same factors as above. Unless your organization is very large and complex, most projects can be completed in one year, or even much smaller.

3. more comprehensive a system is, the better-this item relates to direct the two elements that precedes it; both cost and implementation time can increase exponentially, if a system is not scaled incorrectly to the size of the Organization, as it is used on. Many organizations try to over-document, over-control and over-prescribe their processes and as a result, ends up with a bureaucratic nightmare of paperwork and non-value add activities that really is not even necessary.

4. everything should be perfect in the beginning-is one of the fundamental premises, such as ISO 9001 standard is based on continuous improvement. This includes the Organization's processes, products and its management system. Layman's terms, the system continues to develop and get better over time. While a "perfect" system is the ultimate goal, it is probably not a reasonable expectation starts a day. You can end up wasting time and other resources in trying to build a "Cadillac" while what you really need to get started is a "silverado" truck. Start with a system that works, that achieves desired results and fine-tune as you go forward. Your specific needs will change as time passes so well, so remember that perfection is always a moving target.

5. revisions is frightening and make us nervous-if your organization is afraid of audits, something is wrong. An audit is an evaluation activity to ensure that the quality system is functioning as planned. If your organization is gripped with fear, you probably have a cultural issue where audit findings are more attached to their punitive consequences rather than their beneficial aspects. A review should be used by your organization to evaluate and improve the way their management system is functioning. Leaders must understand that this is a means to identify opportunities for improvement.

6. Let consultants do everything-you can not take a "hands off" approach and let the consultant run your management system. Consultant can be a great help to develop, implement and maintain the system management, but you must own the. systems that are highly dependent on reliable consultant-only while the consultant is directly involved; they tend to lapse (or worse) in the absence of the consultant. Effective management systems is not only deployed in an organization, they are infused in its day-to-day operations and activities. This level of performance can not be achieved by an external resource, which is only around on a regular basis.

7. the maintenance of an ISO 9001 QMS is time consuming-I will not say it won't take a reasonable amount of work, but a well-designed, properly scaled QMS should be sustainable by using an acceptable number of organizational resources. This is actually a criterion ISO 9001 requires the Organization to consider as part of its evaluation of feature (see clause 5.6). If your organization's QMS brings your operations or productivity to a stand-still, you need to consider whether changes are necessary in order to QMS before adding additional staff. It is quite often self-inflicted bureaucracy in the system, which is to blame.

The first step in the development and implementation of a system for management is to separate myth from fact. To rate, is it, perhaps there will be a "myths III" in the not-too-distant future-stay tuned.








Mark Randig is President and founder of MAS Solutions LLC., a Houston, Texas-based consulting firm that specializes in helping companies achieve breakthrough performance by focusing on quality development and improvement of productivity. You can get your free copy of Marks newsletter "The Quality Specialist", go to [http://www.masquality.com]


2011年3月17日 星期四

INMET announces fourth quarter profit of $ 2.53 per share, compared with earnings of $ 1.60 per share in the fourth ...

Inmet (TSX:IMN - News) announces fourth quarter earnings of $2.53 per share compared with earnings of $1.60 per share in the fourth quarter of 2009.


On January 12, 2011, we entered into an arrangement agreement with Lundin Mining Corporation (Lundin) to merge, and create Symterra Corporation (Symterra), an international copper producer.


The proposed merger will be effected by way of a Plan of Arrangement completed under the Canada Business Corporations Act. It will feature a common share exchange through which Inmet common shareholders will receive 3.4918 common shares of the merged company for each common share of Inmet they own and Lundin common shareholders will receive 0.3333 common shares of the merged company for each common share of Lundin they own. The exchange ratio represents no premium to either party based on the 30 day volume weighted average price on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of Inmet and Lundin to January 11, 2011.


Inmet and Lundin shareholders must both approve the proposed merger by two thirds of the votes cast at special shareholder meetings held to consider the transaction. The joint information circular was mailed to shareholders on February 18, 2011. The shareholder meetings will be held on March 14, 2011.


The arrangement agreement includes customary reciprocal deal protections. Each party has agreed not to solicit any alternative transactions and has furthermore agreed to pay the other a break fee of $120 million in certain circumstances. In addition, each company has granted the other a right to match any competing offer.


Both Boards of Directors have determined that the proposed merger is in the best interest of their respective companies based on a number of factors, including fairness opinions received from their financial advisors, and have unanimously approved the terms of the proposed merger and recommend that their respective shareholders vote in favour of the proposed merger.


The largest shareholder of each of Inmet (Leucadia, representing 17.94 percent of Inmet) and Lundin (Lukas Lundin and Lundin family trusts, representing 12.32 percent of Lundin) has executed an agreement to vote their shares in favour of the proposed merger subject to customary fiduciary waivers in the case of a superior offer. The directors of each company have agreed to vote their shares in favour of the merger.


We believe that the combination of the two companies will create a larger, financially stronger, diversified and more globally competitive base metals mining company with a balanced portfolio of five low-cost, long-life mines predominately located in Europe, substantial opening cash balances, a strong balance sheet and excellent growth prospects with two world class copper development projects. We believe that the business combination will create superior value from greater scale, greater management depth, a more diversified asset base and enhanced capital markets profile. We believe that the growth prospects for shareholders are greater through Symterra than Inmet could achieve on its own.


There is a risk that we may not realize the anticipated benefits of the arrangement and statements regarding the merger of Inmet and Lundin are subject to various risks and assumptions. See Forward- looking information on page 4.


In this press release, Inmet means Inmet Mining Corporation and we, us and our mean Inmet and/or its subsidiaries and joint ventures. This quarter refers to the three months ended December 31, 2010.


Securities regulators encourage companies to disclose forward-looking information to help investors understand a company's future prospects. This press release contains statements about our future financial condition, results of operations and business. Our objectives and outlook have been prepared based on our existing operations, expectations and circumstances. If the proposed merger with Lundin occurs, actual results would be substantially different.


These are "forward-looking" because we have used what we know and expect today to make a statement about the future. Forward-looking statements usually include words such as may, expect, anticipate, believe or other similar words. We believe the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, actual events and results could be substantially different because of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business or events that happen after the date of this press release. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. As a general policy, we do not update forward-looking statements except as required by securities laws and regulations.


The table below shows the average metal prices we realized in US dollars and Canadian dollars (the prices we realize include finalization adjustments - see Gross sales on page 8).


Copper prices rose significantly from US $3.67 per pound at the beginning of the quarter, to a record high of US $4.42 per pound on December 31, and averaging US $3.92 per pound for the quarter. This quarter, London Metals Exchange (LME) inventories increased by 4,000 tonnes to 378,000 tonnes.


Zinc prices averaged US $1.05 per pound this quarter, an increase of 15 percent from the third quarter of 2010, despite an increase in LME inventories to approximately 700,000 tonnes on December 31.


Gold prices rose for the ninth consecutive quarter, increasing by 12 percent, and reached a record high of US $1,423 per ounce early in December.


Sulphur prices rose steadily this quarter, driven mainly by increasing prices for agricultural products, which increased demand for sulphuric acid from agricultural product growing regions.


Exchange rates affect our revenue and earnings. The table below shows the average exchange rates we realized this quarter and year to date compared to 2009.


Our sales are affected by the conversion of US dollar revenue to Canadian dollars. Compared to the same quarter last year, the value of the Canadian dollar appreciated 5 percent relative to the US dollar, and 12 percent relative to the euro.


Treatment charges are one component of smelter processing charges. We also pay smelters for content losses and price participation.


The table below shows the average charges we realized this quarter and for the year. While treatment charges for zinc concentrates were higher than last year, price participation was lower.


The table below shows the statutory tax rates for each of our taxable operating mines.


Key components of the change in sales: higher copper prices, new gross sales at Las Cruces, lower sales volumes at Troilus and Cayeli


We record sales that settle during the reporting period using the metal price on the day they settle. For sales that have not settled, we use an estimate based on the month we expect the sale to settle and the forward price of the metal at the end of the reporting period. We recognize the difference between our estimate and the final price by adjusting our gross sales in the period when we settle the sale (finalization adjustment).


This quarter, we recorded $6 million in positive finalization adjustments from third quarter sales.


The finalization adjustment we record for these sales will depend on the actual price we receive when they settle, which can be up to five months from the time we initially record the sales. We expect these sales to settle in the following months:


Significantly higher copper and pyrite sales volumes, lower gold sales volumes this year


Our sales volumes are directly affected by the amount of production from our mines, and our ability to ship to our customers.


Copper production and sales volumes were up this year mainly because of Las Cruces. Zinc production was lower this quarter but higher this year because of changes in zinc grades at Pyhasalmi. Copper and zinc sales volumes were lower than production volumes this quarter mainly because of the timing of shipments at Cayeli. Gold production and sales volumes were lower this year because Troilus ceased production in June 2010. Pyhasalmi realized higher pyrite sales volumes this year because of higher demand from China.


We use our production objectives to estimate our sales target.


We expect copper production in 2011 to be slightly higher than it was this year. Our share of copper production at Las Cruces should more than double as the operation ramps up to its nameplate capacity of 72,000 tonnes of copper cathode, and because we increased our ownership in Las Cruces from 70 percent to 100 percent in December 2010. Higher production at Las Cruces should be mostly offset, however, by the divestment of our 18 percent equity interest in Ok Tedi in January 2011.


We expect 2011 zinc sales volumes to be similar to this year because zinc production should be approximately the same as it was in 2010.


With production ceasing at Troilus in 2010 and the sale of our 18 percent equity investment in Ok Tedi in January 2011, no gold sales are expected for 2011.


Our Canadian dollar sales revenues are affected by the US dollar denominated metal price we receive, and the exchange rate between the US dollar and Canadian dollar.


We expect global copper supply to grow modestly in 2011. New production should be mostly offset by declining production at large existing copper mines and possible labour disruptions. We expect continued strong demand in China, increasing economic recovery in Europe and the United States, and continued interest from investors. Increasing demand, combined with tighter supply, should mean copper prices will remain close to all time highs during 2011.


For zinc, we expect modest increases in both market supply and demand, and a small market deficit, which should support prices in 2011 at levels consistent with those of 2010.


Our copper treatment and refining charges were lower than they were in 2009 because of more favourable terms with smelters. Our 2009 rates were negotiated at the end of 2008, amidst the global market downturn. Zinc treatment charges were higher for the year than for 2009 because of our terms with smelters, more than offset by lower price participation. Zinc treatment charges this quarter were lower than the fourth quarter of 2009 because sales volumes were lower. Content losses were higher because metal prices were higher than they were last year. Freight was higher this year mainly because pyrite shipments were higher.


We sell approximately 90 percent of our copper concentrate under long-term contracts. We expect our costs for copper treatment and refining to remain low in 2011. A tight concentrate supply should keep the copper market in a deficit position in 2011, and treatment costs close to this year's level. We expect copper price participation to be minimal.


We expect total zinc smelter processing charges, including price participation, to be lower than in 2010, and a small deficit to evolve in the zinc concentrate market.


Las Cruces sells its copper cathode production directly to buyers in the Spanish and Mediterranean markets and therefore does not incur smelting processing charges and has relatively low freight costs.


We expect our ocean freight costs to be similar to rates realized in 2010.


Direct production costs are higher this quarter and for the year than they were in 2009, mainly because we began recognizing operating results at Las Cruces in our consolidated income statement effective July 1, 2010, and because of higher labour and royalty costs at Cayeli. This was partly offset by the closure of Troilus, and lower costs at Pyhasalmi because of a stronger Canadian dollar relative to the euro.


Inventory at Cayeli was higher this quarter end because of the timing of shipments, and at Las Cruces because we stockpiled ore before the rainy season. For the year, these increases were offset by the impact of the closure of Troilus in the second quarter of 2010.


These charges include an accrual for asset retirement obligations, provisions for severance and retirement and other non-cash expenses. We recorded an additional $8 million this year for closure liabilities at Troilus to reflect the longer time we expect will be required for post-closure monitoring, as well as higher owner and other costs. In 2009, we recorded an additional $6 million for closure liabilities at our closed sites to reflect the longer time we expected to treat water at certain sites, and because of escalating costs.


We expect consolidated direct production costs to be lower in 2011 because of the closure of Troilus mid-year in 2010 and the disposition of our 18 percent interest in Ok Tedi. These lower costs will be somewhat offset by production costs at Las Cruces that will be recognized in the income statement for the entire year.


Our budget for 2011 assumes our costs at Cayeli and Pyhasalmi will be similar to 2010.


Certain variable costs may continue to affect our earnings, depending on metal prices:


Depreciation was higher this year mainly because Las Cruces began to depreciate its operating assets in the income statement on July 1, 2010. Depreciation decreased at Troilus because the mine concluded operations in June 2010. Depreciation at Ok Tedi was higher this year because it increased the assets related to asset retirement obligations at the end of 2009 and began amortizing the cost of storage pits it constructed to store the sulphur concentrate the tailings management plant produces.


We expect depreciation to be higher in 2011 mainly because we will recognize Las Cruces' operating results in earnings for the entire year. Depreciation will be higher at Cayeli as a result of the impact of adoption of IFRS (see Plan on transition to International Financial Reporting Standards - Impairment of assets on page 30). This will be offset somewhat by the closure of Troilus and the sale of our 18 percent share of Ok Tedi.


Corporate costs include general and administration costs, taxes, interest and other income.


General and administration costs are largely for management remuneration, governance and strategy. Costs in 2010 were $3 million lower than 2009 ($5 million in the fourth quarter) mainly because of the costs associated with the changes to the board and executive management in 2009. This was somewhat offset by higher human resource and other costs in 2010 in preparation for moving forward with Cobre Panama.


We sold 9.45 million common shares of Premier Gold Mines Ltd. this quarter for $61.4 million in cash and recognized a gain of $50.5 million, taking advantage of favourable market conditions.


Recognition of interest rate swap contract and foreign currency forward contract in 2009


In the third quarter of 2009, we repaid 100 percent of Las Cruces' US dollar denominated bank credit facility (see also Long-term debt repayments and settlement of interest rate swap contract - 2009 on page 27), and replaced it with intergroup debt using the proceeds from our equity offering earlier that year. In conjunction with this, Las Cruces terminated its interest rate swap contracts, paying out $16 million for early termination. This had the following effects on investment and other income in 2009:


We recognized foreign exchanges losses of $23 million this year on the repatriation of cash from Cayeli, Pyhasalmi and Ok Tedi. In 2009, we recognized foreign exchange losses of $14 million from revaluing US dollar denominated cash we held at Corporate to repay Las Cruces' US dollar denominated debt under its credit facility.


Investment and other income is affected by our cash and held to maturity investment balances, and by interest rates and exchange rates. In 2011, we will stop recognizing foreign exchange gains and losses when we repatriate funds that represent the accumulation of earnings at our operations. See Plans on transition to International Financial Reporting Standards on page 30 for more information. We also expect to recognize a significant gain as a result of the disposition of our 18 percent investment in Ok Tedi.


We could not mine ore at Las Cruces in the first quarter of 2010 because of the water levels in the pit. We expensed $6.8 million in operating and maintenance costs for the water purification plant because they did not relate to production activities.


We made a decision in 2008 not to proceed with the Cerattepe project. All work ceased on the project and we took a $34 million charge to write down the assets to its net realizable value. In 2009, we took an additional impairment charge of $10 million, as well as a $6 million tax recovery (reflected in income taxes), to adjust to current net realizable value.


Our tax expense changes as our earnings change.


The consolidated effective tax rate fell this year compared to 2009 mainly because Las Cruces recognized a tax recovery on a foreign exchange loss from its intercompany US dollar denominated debt. The foreign exchange eliminates on consolidation, but the tax recovery does not as there is no corresponding tax expense on the foreign exchange gain. Additionally, mining duties for Troilus were lower as operations concluded during 2010.


We expect statutory tax rates at our operations to remain the same as they were in 2010 unless a statutory tax rate change is enacted.


Our financial review by operation includes estimates for 2011 operating earnings and operating cash flows. We used our 2011 objectives for production and cost per tonne of ore milled to build these estimates, as well as the following assumptions:


Cayeli's mine production reached a record 1.16 million tonnes this year, and set several new records in the fourth quarter of 2010 for milling, including best daily tonnage of 3,850 tonnes, and best weekly tonnage of 26,600 tonnes. The mine also placed a record amount of pastefill and shotcrete during the year.


Despite this, mill production was slightly lower than 2009 production as well as our objective for 2010 of 1.2 million tonnes. This was due to higher rehabilitation requirements in the highest producing areas during July, and two lesser ground falls this quarter.


Copper grades were consistent with our 2010 target and zinc grades were slightly above our 2010 target despite the mine plan changes incurred due to the July rehabilitation requirements.


Copper recoveries for 2010 were below our target and last year's recoveries due to more difficult metallurgy from the increased presence of secondary copper minerals and less than optimal blending conditions from low blending stockpile volumes during several periods over the course of the year.


Copper production was therefore below 2009 and our target this year, while zinc production was essentially on target.


Over the year, we conducted a thorough ground control audit evaluating all aspects of the mine's ground control program. We also completed a shotcrete ground support audit, continued developing a life of mine sequence stress model and commissioned a microseismic event analysis, all to reduce the geotechnical risks associated with a maturing ore body.


We completed the second and final phase to correct the misalignment of the Cayeli headframe this year (the result of local ground movement over the years). The headframe is now aligned with the concrete collar and under normal stresses. A formal program has been established to monitor the facility in the future and adjust it, if necessary.


Cost per tonne of ore milled was higher this year mainly because of higher royalties from higher realized metals prices and labour cost increases.


In 2011, production levels should remain at approximately 1.2 million tonnes, and the copper grades should remain essentially unchanged at 3.2 percent. We expect zinc grades to decrease to 5.6 percent, reflecting lower zinc grades in the deeper areas of the mine.


With the commissioning of the new copper column flotation cell and high quality copper concentrate thickener, we expect improvements in copper and zinc recoveries as well as improved zinc depression in the copper concentrate. We therefore expect recoveries to increase to 80 percent for copper and 73 percent for zinc.


Lower earnings for the quarter because sales volumes were lower due to timing of shipments


The objective for 2011 uses the assumptions listed on page 15.


The table below shows what contributed to the change in operating earnings and operating cash flow between 2010 and 2009.


We spent $15 million to upgrade underground mobile equipment, remediate the headframe, install a new double deck screen for the crusher and a copper column flotation cell and thickener in the mill and add to our mine development. In 2009, we spent $15 million to upgrade underground mobile equipment, remediate the headframe and continue mine development.


We expect to spend $19 million on capital in 2011 for underground development, ore pass rehabilitation, mobile equipment, a shotcrete delivery line extension, a new concrete batch plant and additional mill improvements.


Significant progress has been made to date with the production process. Initially, our efforts were directed at correcting equipment deficiencies and materials selection for the plant. During this "1st Phase" of commissioning, frequent breakdowns prevented the ramp up and stable operation of the plant until April 2010. Plant reliability has since greatly improved and no substantial mechanical downtime was experienced in the second half of the year. In a "2nd Phase", we addressed bottlenecks in the plant design and shifted our main focus to increasing throughput while working to balance plant runtime with the process chemistry. In July and August 2010, throughput rose to 50 percent of design capacity.


In mid-September, we entered the "3rd Phase" dedicated to metallurgical optimization. We made a strategic decision to lower plant throughput to implement measures to reach and maintain our design recovery rates (above 90 percent). This was a necessary step to achieve the proper leaching conditions before further increasing the copper feed and potentially sacrificing copper recoveries. In the fourth quarter, we reached recovery levels of over 86 percent and we plan to continue to raise throughput in step with maintaining recovery levels. We are now focused on two key remaining issues:


We produced 28,500 tonnes of copper cathode this year. Cathode quality remains excellent and we are working towards our LME Grade A certification. Notwithstanding the significant improvements achieved this year, production fell short of our target.


On December 15, 2010, we acquired Leucadia National Corporation's 30 percent indirect equity interest and subordinated sponsor loans in Las Cruces for value of $497 million. This included US $150 million in cash and US $330 million in Inmet common shares (5.4 million shares). At the same time, Leucadia was released from its guarantee of US $72 million of the debt Las Cruces took on in 2009 to re-finance its project facility. The loan is owed to an Inmet affiliate. Beginning December 15, 2010, we have included 100 percent of Las Cruces' results in our consolidated statement of earnings.


We expect throughput and recoveries to continue to improve in 2011 and that production will follow a "saw-toothed" pattern. By the end of the year, we expect to be producing at a rate of 6,000 tonnes per month - full plant production capacity - and we expect to produce a total of 50,200 tonnes of copper cathode in 2011.


A number of process improvements are underway and will be completed in 2011 including:


Las Cruces has mined and stockpiled high grade ore to ship directly to smelters. We have not received the permit we need to move the material offsite and, therefore, have not included any direct ore shipments in our objectives. We will use this high grade ore for blending with lower grade ore to optimize feed grades processed through the plant during the first half of 2011. We anticipate mining additional high grade ore in 2011 which could be utilized for direct ore shipments if a permit is received.


The objective for 2011 uses the assumptions listed on page 15.


Capital spending this year was mainly on the permanent water purification plant, plant improvements and mine development. In 2009 it was mainly for construction capital.


We expect to spend $52 million on capital projects in 2011 including $18 million for mine development and $25 million for plant improvements.


Throughput continued at record levels in 2010 - Pyhasalmi processed 1.4 million tonnes of ore through the mill, and had an excellent 96 percent availability with copper recoveries of 96 percent and zinc recoveries of 90 percent. It also successfully reduced the amount of open void by 10 percent year over year, improving geotechnical stability. Additionally, we improved the reliability of the backfill supply by keeping the fill raise system full, increasing stability and minimizing raise failures and blockages.


Copper production in 2010 was higher than target and higher than 2009 because grades were higher. Zinc production was higher than 2009 but lower than target because we moved some higher zinc grade stopes that were due to be mined late in the year into 2011. We produced 40 percent more pyrite this year than planned to meet increasing demand.


Cost per tonne of ore milled was significantly lower than last year mainly because of Canadian dollar appreciation against the euro.


Pyhasalmi expects to mine 1.4 million tonnes of 1 percent copper and 2.6 percent zinc in 2011, and produce 13,300 tonnes of copper and 31,900 tonnes of zinc. Zinc production will increasingly come from fewer higher grade zinc stopes on the periphery of the orebody and this may result in zinc grade fluctuations if mine plans are modified during the year to respond to operational factors.


Pyrite sales enhance Pyhasalmi's financial performance, so we will continue our efforts to enter new markets in Europe and Asia. Combined with a long term agreement reached with a Finnish customer this year, we are well positioned for ongoing pyrite sales for the longer term.


The objective for 2011 uses the assumptions listed on page 15.


The table below shows what contributed to the change in operating earnings and operating cash flow between 2010 and 2009.


Capital spending in 2011 is mainly to replace underground mobile equipment.


Mill throughput was lower this quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2009 because Ok Tedi carried out mill maintenance that had originally been scheduled for early 2011, which reduced copper and gold production. Mill throughput, copper and gold production for the year were slightly lower than 2009.


Gold grades and production in 2010 continued to be lower than plan because of deferrals made in the mine plan to avoid processing high sulphur, high gold areas of the mine. Although the mine waste management plant has been significantly redesigned and modified, its performance continues to be challenged. To control sulphur, the ore is blended in the mine before it goes to the mill. Ok Tedi mined lower benches that contain more copper and less sulphur and gold. The higher grade gold ore can be mined but will not be processed until after the mine waste management plant is performing to expectations. A team of in-house and consulting specialists are working on the plant's technical and operational issues. Ok Tedi is also exploring other alternatives for neutralizing the impact of sulphur.


On December 2, 2010, we announced an agreement with Ok Tedi Mining Limited for it to repurchase our 18 percent equity interest in Ok Tedi for US $335 million. Our net proceeds after withholding taxes in Papua New Guinea were US $307 million. The transaction closed on January 28, 2011. At December 31, 2010, our interest in Ok Tedi was classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheet.


The table below shows what contributed to the change in operating earnings and operating cash flow between 2010 and 2009.


In 2010, Ok Tedi spent $91 million (our share is $16 million), mainly on a mining fleet specifically designed for limestone mining, and to construct storage pits for sulphur concentrate produced by the tailings management plant. In 2009, spending was mainly on the pit drainage project.


Autoridad Nacional del Ambiente (ANAM), the Panamanian environmental regulatory authority, continued its review of Minera Panama's Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) this quarter, on schedule. ANAM has engaged external experts to assist in its review of the ESIA and they are fully deployed.


We held a public forum in November to present the ESIA to the local community, as required by legislation. More than 1,000 people from all over Panama, but mostly from local communities, attended the five-hour forum, which we held in the village of Coclecito, close to the project site. We provided all of the time necessary to respond to written questions and listen to presentations from interested parties, and the forum was well received by all participants.


We received the first formal request from ANAM for additional information in early February as expected, and we are preparing responses. We continue to estimate that approval for the ESIA and permitting to begin construction could take as long as 15 months from the time the ESIA report was submitted in September 2010. After we receive the approvals, site capture, preparation and construction should take approximately 48 months.


In November, Minera Panama awarded a contract for engineering, procurement and construction management (EP+CM) to Joint Venture Panama Inc. (JVP), a joint venture led by SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. (70%) with partners GyM S.A. (a member of Grana y Montero Group) (15%) and Techint International Construction Corp. (15%).


The award concluded an eight-month competitive process involving a team of more than 60 professionals from Inmet, Minera Panama and external consulting firms who performed a detailed and exhaustive evaluation of bidders. The initial phase of the EP+CM contract will involve basic engineering for all facilities except the power plant, and should take approximately 12 months to complete. The power plant, as previously announced, is to be developed under a separate agreement with GDF Suez Central America.


Work also continued to upgrade and improve access roads to the site. We completed two new bridges by year end, over rivers that are prone to flooding, and continued routine road maintenance. The bridges will benefit both the project and local communities. Additional improvements to access roads are in the engineering and permitting stage.


We drilled a total of 20,000 metres this year in 119 holes. More than half of these holes were for geotechnical purposes, while most of the remaining holes focused on further defining existing resources. We have also begun testing additional exploration targets on the property.


We develop our financing strategy by looking at our long-term capital requirements, and deciding on the optimal mix of cash, future operating cash flow, credit facilities and project financing.


Our capital structure includes a liquidity cushion that gives us the flexibility to deal with operational disruptions or general market downturns.


Operating cash flows this year were higher than in 2009 because our operating earnings and depreciation were both higher. This was partly offset by the payment of more taxes.


The table below shows expected operating cash flow from our key operations, based on our outlook for metal prices and production listed on page 15, and the assumptions in Results of our operations, which starts on page 15.


Please see Results of our operations and Status of our development project for a discussion of actual results and our 2011 objective. Capital spending in 2010 was mainly for Cobre Panama.


We bought $229 million in medium-term Canadian government and corporate bonds with credit ratings of A to AAA this year. The bonds mature between February 2011 and December 2015 and have a weighted average annual yield of 1.8 percent. This will increase our return on the cash we have set aside for capital spending at Cobre Panama.


Cayeli also bought $67 million in US Treasury bonds with credit ratings of AAA, for a higher return on cash that we believe will not be repatriated within the next 5 years. The bonds mature in 2015 and have a weighted average annual yield to maturity of 1.24 percent.


We paid $151 million in cash this quarter as part of our acquisition of Leucadia's 30 percent indirect equity interest and subordinated sponsor loans in Las Cruces.


We sold our 9.45 million common shares of Premier Gold for $61.4 million in cash this quarter.


In the second quarter of 2009, we completed a public offering of 7.825 million common shares of Inmet Mining, for total gross proceeds of $348 million ($334 million net of transaction costs).


In the first half of 2009, Las Cruces made its first scheduled repayment of US $12 million under Tranche A of its credit facility. It also repaid EUR42 million under Tranche B (an amount equal to the subsidies received).


In July 2009, Las Cruces repaid the remaining US $203 million under Tranche A, EUR5 million under Tranche B and cash collateralized $32 million in letters of credit that had been secured under the credit facility. This eliminated the Las Cruces project credit facility. We funded 100 percent of the repayment through an intercompany loan.


Las Cruces also paid $16 million in July 2009 to terminate its interest rate swap contract, in connection with the decision to repay the credit facility.


Las Cruces received $71 million in subsidy grants in 2009 to build the mine and process plant, under government assistance programs in the European Union.


We expect capital spending to be $303 million in 2011. The more significant items include:


On March 31, 2010, we entered into a subscription agreement with a subsidiary of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited (Temasek), under which Temasek agreed to buy 9.26 million subscription receipts at a price of $54.0049 each, exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for Inmet common shares, for total proceeds of $500 million.


On December 23, 2010, the agreement was amended such that each subscription receipt will now be exchangeable for 0.840283 of an Inmet common share, representing a subscription price per Inmet common share of $64.2699, or a 15 percent discount to the five day volume-weighted average price of Inmet common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange as at December 22, 2010. The subscription receipts will now be automatically exchanged no later than 150 days after the coming into effect of legislation to amend the Code as described below. Upon exchange of the subscription receipts, Inmet's issued and outstanding shares will increase to 69.3 million common shares. Temasek will receive 7.78 million Inmet common shares, that would represent approximately 11.2 percent of Inmet's issued and outstanding common shares at that time, on a non-diluted basis.


The subscription receipts are exchangeable into Inmet common shares, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the coming into effect of legislation passed by the legislative assembly of the Republic of Panama amending Panama's Mineral Resources Code (the "Code") to permit entities in which foreign governmental bodies or authorities have an interest to hold direct or indirect interests in mining concessions in Panama.


Inmet and Temasek have also amended the investor rights agreement previously executed between them that will take effect upon exchange of the subscription receipts for common shares. Under the amended investor rights agreements, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, Temasek and members of its group will now be permitted to divest their Inmet common shares (or economic interest therein), or increase their ownership of Inmet common shares, after a period of four months following the exchange of the subscription receipts for Inmet common shares.


The subscription receipt proceeds will remain in escrow pending exchange of the subscription receipts for common shares. On completion of the exchange, the escrowed funds will be released to Inmet and the proceeds will be used by Inmet for the development of its Cobre Panama project and for general corporate purposes.


The legislation to amend the Code passed final reading in the Panamanian Assembly and came into effect in February 2011. We expect to exchange the Temasek subscription receipts for common shares before June 30, 2011.


Our strategy is to make sure we have sufficient liquidity (including cash and committed credit facilities) to finance our operating requirements as well as our growth projects. At December 31, 2010, we had $699 million in cash, including $326 million of cash and short-term investments and $373 million invested in long-term bonds.


At December 31, 2010, our cash and short-term investments of $326 million included cash and money market instruments that mature in 90 days or less, and short-term investments that mature in 91 days to a year.


Our policy is to invest excess cash in highly liquid investments of the highest credit quality, and to limit our exposure to individual counterparties to minimize the risk associated with these investments. We base our decisions about the length of maturities on our cash flow requirements, rates of return and other factors.


The economic downturn appears to be reversing, but we are still monitoring the potential for a second downturn. We have moved some of our government funds to prime funds and have created a bond portfolio that should provide better yields with little change to our investment risk. At December 31, 2010, we held cash and short-term investments in the following:


See note 4 on page 48 in the consolidated financial statements for more details about where our cash is invested.


As at December 31, 2010, the bond portfolio of $373 million (Held to maturity investments), comprised 17 percent US Treasury bonds, 8 percent Government of Canada bonds, 65 percent Provincial Government bonds and 10 percent corporate bonds. The bonds mature between February 2011 and December 2015.


The Accounting Standards Board has confirmed that International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) will replace current Canadian GAAP for financial periods beginning on and after January 1, 2011. IFRS is based on a conceptual framework similar to Canadian GAAP, but there are significant differences in recognition, measurement and disclosure.


While the adoption of IFRS will not change our business activities, it will result in changes to our reported financial position and net income.


We have prepared a comprehensive IFRS convergence plan that addresses the changes in accounting policy, restatement of comparative periods, internal control over financial reporting, modification of existing systems, the training and awareness of staff, and other related items. Senior financial management, who report to and are overseen by Inmet's Audit Committee, are responsible for planning and implementing the conversion.


To date, we have determined all of our significant accounting policies, prepared sample financial statements and assessed the impacts on our systems and processes. We have put a dual reporting solution in place to maintain our accounting records according to both Canadian GAAP and IFRS for our 2010 dual reporting year. We have been working alongside our auditors while determining our accounting policies, to ensure they agree with our choices, and that we are choosing policies that are consistent with our peers in the industry. While documenting our new policies, we have documented the related internal controls.


We have prepared a reconciliation of our historical Canadian GAAP balance sheet to IFRS balance sheet as at January 1, 2010 and for our financial statements for the first, second and third quarters of 2010. We will focus next on preparing financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with our expected IFRS accounting policies.


We do not expect our key controls to change during and after our transition to IFRS. We believe our training program and the preparation of reconciliations to IFRS, have given our staff an appropriate understanding of IFRS as it applies to our financial reporting.


The paragraphs that follow list the major differences between our current accounting policies under Canadian GAAP and the accounting policies we currently expect to apply when we transition to IFRS. We have also provided quantification for the most significant differences in our balance sheet as at January 1, 2010 and our statement of earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We currently expect these changes will increase the equity attributable to common shareholders of Inmet Mining on our January 1, 2010 opening balance sheet under IFRS by approximately $50 million, or $0.90 per common share, compared to our December 31, 2009 balance sheet under Canadian GAAP. We may choose to adopt different IFRS accounting policies, or we may choose to apply them only to certain transactions or circumstances, so our conversion to IFRS may be different from what we are currently expecting.


The standard-setting bodies that determine IFRS also have significant ongoing projects that could affect the ultimate differences between Canadian GAAP and IFRS, and their impact on our consolidated financial statements. The impact IFRS has in future years will depend on circumstances at the time. We will continue to monitor changes to IFRS and adjust our convergence plan as necessary.


IFRS uses a one step approach to test for and measure impairment, and compares asset carrying values directly with the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use (which uses discounted future cash flows).


This approach will lead to write-downs when carrying values of assets supported under Canadian GAAP on an undiscounted basis are not supported on a discounted basis under IFRS. IFRS also requires a full or partial reversal of previous impairment losses when circumstances have changed and the impairments have been reduced. Impairment losses cannot be reversed under Canadian GAAP.


We expect to increase January 1, 2010 property plant and equipment at Cayeli by approximately $50 million to reverse an impairment charge we recognized for this operation in 1996. The increase is the IFRS carrying amount we would have calculated, net of depreciation, if we had not recognized the original impairment. This will result in a higher ongoing depreciation expense for Cayeli.


Under Canadian GAAP, mining companies that are acquired in the early development stage often do not constitute a business, and instead are accounted for as an acquisition of assets without any goodwill. The definition of a business under IFRS is broader, and most acquisitions represent business combinations, so goodwill is recognized more frequently.


Under Canadian GAAP, companies that acquire an additional interest in an entity they already control must account for it as a step acquisition. Under IFRS, acquiring a non-controlling interest is not considered a business combination, and is instead accounted for as an equity transaction.


Under IFRS, we will account for our acquisition of the remaining 30 percent interest in Las Cruces, which closed in December 2010, as an equity transaction, because we already controlled it. We will recognize the difference between the non-controlling interest (as determined under IFRS) and the fair value of the consideration paid, in retained earnings.


In addition, most identifiable assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and goodwill acquired in a business combination are recorded at full fair value under IFRS. Under Canadian GAAP, only the ownership percentage acquired is recorded. Non-controlling interests are recognized at book value.


Under Canadian GAAP, we use a credit adjusted risk free interest rate and are not required to update the rate when market rates change.


Under IFRS, we will measure asset retirement obligations using a risk free interest rate and revalue when market risk free interest rates change. We expect to increase January 1, 2010 asset retirement obligations by approximately $40 million on transition to IFRS.


Under Canadian GAAP, we recognize revenue when title is legally transferred to the purchaser. For certain shipments at Cayeli, Pyhasalmi and Ok Tedi, we transfer title when we receive the first provisional payment, which is later than the transfer point for risks and rewards of ownership.


Under IFRS, we will recognize revenue when all significant risks and rewards of ownership of our products are transferred to the purchaser. We expect to increase January 1, 2010 accounts receivable by approximately $25 million and decrease inventories by $6 million on transition to IFRS.


Under Canadian GAAP, dividends, including those related to the accumulation of earnings and repayment of intercompany debt, are considered a return on investment, and we recognize the deferred foreign exchange gains or losses on these amounts in investment and other income.


Under IFRS, only dividends that represent a return on capital invested in a foreign operation require recognition of previously deferred foreign exchange gains or losses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we expect to reverse foreign exchange losses of $23 million related to the repatriation of accumulated earnings from our operations as a result of our transition to IFRS.


We will need to recognize the corresponding tax asset or liability based on the resultant differences between the new carrying value of assets and liabilities under IFRS and their associated tax bases.


First time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 1) lists specific exemptions that we can use when we first adopt IFRS. The most significant exemptions we expect to apply are as follows:


We can use an optional transitional calculation to determine the property, plant and equipment associated with our provision for asset retirement obligations. Under the transitional calculation, we measure the provision at the transition date and discount it to the date the liability first arose. The result becomes the initial asset value. Depreciation is applied to this value. We expect to apply this exemption for certain mines and not determine property, plant and equipment associated with asset retirement obligations retrospectively and anticipate an increase of approximately $10 million to property, plant and equipment on transition to IFRS.


Pages 34 and 35 includes supplementary financial information about cash costs. These measures do not fall into the category of generally accepted accounting principles.


We use unit cash cost information as a key performance indicator, both on a segmented and consolidated basis. We have included cash costs as supplementary information because we believe our key stakeholders use these measures as a financial indicator of our profitability and cash flows before the effects of capital investment and financing costs, such as interest.


Since cash costs are not recognized measures under Canadian generally accepted accounting principles they should not be considered in isolation of earnings or cash flows. There is also no standard way to calculate cash costs, so they are not a reliable way to compare us to other companies.


Inmet is a Canadian-based global mining company that produces copper and zinc. We have interests in three mining operations in locations around the world: Cayeli, Las Cruces and Pyhasalmi. We also have a 100 percent interest in Cobre Panama, a development property in Panama.


- 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time


Starting at approximately 10:00 a.m. (ET) Thursday, February 24, 2011, a conference call replay will be available

 

INMET MINING CORPORATION
Supplementary financial information


Cash costs
2010 For the year ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------
LAS
CRUCES TOTAL
CAYELI (1) PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(US dollars)


Direct production costs $ 1.28 $ 1.64 $ 1.63 $ 1.32 $ 1.41
Royalties and variable
compensation 0.14 0.06 - 0.10 0.09
Smelter processing
charges and freight 1.41 0.01 1.11 0.56 0.86
Metal credits (2.19) - (2.95) (1.85) (1.87)
----------------------------------------------------


Cash cost $ 0.64 $ 1.71 ($0.21) $ 0.13 $ 0.49
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------
LAS TOTAL
CAYELI CRUCES PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(US dollars)


Direct production costs $ 1.02 $ - $ 1.71 $ 1.23 $ 1.24
Royalties and variable
compensation 0.10 - - 0.05 0.06
Smelter processing
charges and freight 1.24 - 1.08 0.43 0.88
Metal credits (1.73) - (2.26) (1.49) (1.74)
----------------------------------------------------


Cash cost $ 0.63 $ - $ 0.53 $ 0.22 $ 0.44
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reconciliation of cash costs to statements of earnings
2010 For the year ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------
(millions of Canadian LAS
dollars, except where CRUCES TOTAL
otherwise noted) CAYELI (1) PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GAAP reference page 17 page 19 page 21 page 23
Direct production costs $ 91 $ 67 $ 55 $ 93 $ 306
Smelter processing
charges and freight 72 - 54 36 162
By product sales (119) - (112) (115) (346)
Adjust smelter
processing and freight,
and sales to production
basis (3) - (4) (6) (13)
----------------------------------------------------
Operating costs net of
metal credits $ 41 $ 67 ($7) $ 8 $ 109
US $ to C$ exchange rate $ 1.03 $ 1.03 $ 1.03 $ 1.03 $ 1.03
Inmet's share of
production (000's) 62,100 38,300 32,400 63,400 196,200
----------------------------------------------------
Cash cost $ 0.64 $ 1.71 ($0.21) $ 0.13 $ 0.49
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------


(millions of Canadian
dollars, except where LAS TOTAL
otherwise noted) CAYELI CRUCES PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GAAP reference page 17 page 19 page 21 page 23
Direct production costs $ 83 $ - $ 62 $ 96 $ 241
Smelter processing
charges and freight 82 - 51 30 163
By product sales (120) - (96) (105) (321)
Adjust smelter
processing and freight,
and sales to production
basis 1 - 2 (4) (1)
----------------------------------------------------
Operating costs net of
metal credits $ 46 $ - $ 19 $ 17 $ 82
US $ to C$ exchange rate $ 1.14 $ - $ 1.14 $ 1.14 $ 1.14
Inmet's share of
production (000's) 63,900 - 33,100 66,100 163,100
----------------------------------------------------
Cash cost $ 0.63 $ - $ 0.53 $ 0.22 $ 0.44
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


(1) Las Cruces' results are included from July 1, 2010


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Supplementary financial information


Cash costs
2010 For the three months ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------


LAS
CRUCES TOTAL
CAYELI (1) PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(US dollars)


Direct production costs $ 1.50 $ 1.75 $ 1.69 $ 1.33 $ 1.54
Royalties and variable
compensation 0.22 0.06 - 0.09 0.10
Smelter processing
charges and freight 1.61 0.01 1.24 0.57 0.79
Metal credits (2.76) - (3.61) (2.00) (1.90)
----------------------------------------------------


Cash cost $ 0.57 $ 1.82 ($0.68) ($0.01) $ 0.53
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three months ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------


LAS TOTAL
CAYELI CRUCES PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(US dollars)


Direct production costs $ 1.06 $ - $ 2.05 $ 1.11 $ 1.25
Royalties and variable
compensation 0.15 - - 0.08 0.09
Smelter processing
charges and freight 1.45 - 1.70 0.47 1.06
Metal credits (2.26) - (3.57) (1.58) (2.18)
----------------------------------------------------


Cash cost $ 0.40 $ - $ 0.18 $ 0.08 $ 0.22
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


Reconciliation of cash costs to statements of earnings
2010 For the three months ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------
(millions of Canadian LAS
dollars, except where CRUCES TOTAL
otherwise noted) CAYELI (1) PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GAAP reference page 17 page 19 page 21 page 23
Direct production costs $ 26 $ 36 $ 15 $ 26 $ 103
Smelter processing
charges and freight 15 - 14 9 38
By product sales (27) - (30) (33) (90)
Adjust smelter
processing and freight,
and sales to production
basis (5) - (5) (3) (13)
----------------------------------------------------
Operating costs net of
metal credits $ 9 $ 36 ($6) ($1) $ 38
US $ to C$ exchange rate $ 1.01 $ 1.01 $ 1.01 $ 1.01 $ 1.01
Inmet's share of
production (000's) 14,600 19,900 8,500 18,000 61,000
----------------------------------------------------
Cash cost $ 0.57 $ 1.82 ($0.68) ($0.01) $ 0.53
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three months ended December 31
per pound of copper
----------------------------------------------------
(millions of Canadian
dollars, except where LAS TOTAL
otherwise noted) CAYELI CRUCES PYHASALMI OK TEDI COPPER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GAAP reference page 17 page 19 page 21 page 23
Direct production costs $ 24 $ - $ 17 $ 25 $ 66
Smelter processing
charges and freight 27 - 17 7 51
By product sales (45) - (34) (25) (104)
Adjust smelter
processing and freight,
and sales to production
basis 2 - 2 (5) (1)
----------------------------------------------------
Operating costs net of
metal credits $ 8 - $ 2 $ 2 $ 12
US $ to C$ exchange rate $ 1.06 - $ 1.06 $ 1.06 $ 1.06
Inmet's share of
production (000's) 18,100 - 7,900 20,200 46,200
----------------------------------------------------
Cash cost $ 0.40 $ - $ 0.18 $ 0.08 $ 0.22
----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------


(1) Las Cruces' results are included from July 1, 2010


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Quarterly review
(unaudited)


Latest Four Quarters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian 2010 2010 2010 2010
dollars, except per Fourth Third Second First
share amounts) quarter quarter quarter quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Gross sales $ 318,128 $ 313,349 $ 215,051 $ 251,559
Smelter processing
charges and freight (38,440) (47,191) (36,794) (44,329)
Cost of sales (98,625) (93,722) (72,437) (80,980)
Depreciation (23,361) (24,308) (18,951) (15,224)
----------------------------------------------------
157,702 148,128 86,869 111,026
Corporate development
and exploration (3,975) (2,758) (2,524) (2,779)
General and
administration (4,767) (4,073) (6,288) (5,510)
Investment and other
income 50,331 3,533 (18,370) (78)
Stand-by costs - - - (6,753)
Interest expense (2,520) (3,480) (421) (452)
Capital tax expense (127) (82) (82) (82)
Income tax expense (54,180) (45,272) (15,167) (20,063)
Non-controlling interest 2,041 (9,910) 4,419 4,562
----------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 144,505 $ 86,086 $ 48,436 $ 79,871
----------------------------------------------------
Net income per common
share $ 2.53 $ 1.53 $ 0.86 $ 1.42
----------------------------------------------------
Diluted net income per
common share $ 2.53 $ 1.53 $ 0.86 $ 1.42
----------------------------------------------------


Previous Four Quarters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian 2009 2009 2009 2009
dollars, except per Fourth Third Second First
share amounts) quarter quarter quarter quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
Gross sales $ 290,570 $ 241,121 $ 213,042 $ 239,152
Smelter processing
charges and freight (53,696) (41,607) (40,589) (40,540)
Cost of sales (74,995) (72,706) (73,827) (89,904)
Depreciation (17,911) (14,558) (13,604) (15,679)
----------------------------------------------------
143,968 112,250 85,022 93,029
Corporate development
and exploration (2,915) (1,963) (2,727) (3,232)
General and
administration (9,836) (5,147) (4,785) (4,124)
Investment and other
income 280 3,588 16,466 (11,203)
Asset impairment (3,496) - - (6,419)
Interest expense (496) (496) (493) (492)
Capital tax expense 69 (744) (125) (125)
Income tax expense (38,668) (39,244) (24,052) (18,890)
Non-controlling interest 857 (6,693) (2,778) 2,783
----------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 89,763 $ 61,551 $ 66,528 $ 51,327
----------------------------------------------------
Net income per common
share $ 1.60 $ 1.10 $ 1.37 $ 1.06
----------------------------------------------------
Diluted net income per
common share $ 1.60 $ 1.09 $ 1.36 $ 1.06
----------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated balance sheets


Note December 31 December 31
(thousands of Canadian dollars) reference 2010 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and short-term investments 4 $ 326,425 $ 533,913
Restricted cash 5 617 15,130
Accounts receivable 91,893 129,987
Inventories 84,077 103,108
Current portion of held to
maturity investments 8 53,915 9,993
Future income tax asset 27,614 8,466
Assets Held for Sale 6 282,255 -
-------------------------------
866,796 800,597
Restricted cash 5 70,059 101,589
Property, plant and equipment 1,921,843 1,860,616
Investments in equity securities 7 2,694 42,411
Held to maturity investments 8 318,615 89,891
Future income tax asset 1,336 6,151
Goodwill 76,368 -
Other assets 4,865 2,894
-------------------------------
$ 3,262,576 $ 2,904,149
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities $ 153,111 $ 185,145
Derivatives - 1,543
Future income tax liabilities - 4,612
Liabilities associated with
assets held for sale 6 102,447 -
-------------------------------
255,558 191,300
Long-term debt 9 16,619 200,026
Asset retirement obligations 10 108,592 145,038
Derivatives - 3,165
Other liabilities 28,123 32,113
Future income tax liabilities 95,200 16,357
Non-controlling interest - 78,005
-------------------------------
504,092 666,004
-------------------------------


Commitments 11


Shareholders' equity


Share capital 1,015,698 669,952
Contributed surplus 64,972 63,296
Stock based compensation 6,542 5,170
Retained earnings 1,889,491 1,541,803
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss 13 (218,219) (42,076)
-------------------------------


2,758,484 2,238,145
-------------------------------
$ 3,262,576 $ 2,904,149
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see accompanying notes)


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Segmented balance sheets

 

2010 As at December 31


(unaudited) CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian
dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Assets
Cash and short-term
investments $ 53,184 $ 107,750 $ 59,866 $ 97,056
Other current assets 59,956 52,215 81,214 63,268
Restricted cash 16,906 - 51,521 1,632
Property, plant and
equipment 779 114,277 1,171,800 60,772
Investments in equity
securities 2,694 - - -
Held to maturity
investments 253,749 64,866 - -
Goodwill - - 76,368 -
Other non-current assets 3,482 2,719 - -
----------------------------------------------------
$ 390,750 $ 341,827 $ 1,440,769 $ 222,728
----------------------------------------------------


Liabilities
Current liabilities $ 15,788 $ 38,981 $ 47,220 $ 28,684
Long-term debt 16,619 - - -
Asset retirement
obligations 27,368 8,807 47,129 19,907
Other liabilities 4,478 6,204 17,441 -
Future income tax
liabilities - - 84,376 10,824
----------------------------------------------------
$ 64,253 $ 53,992 $ 196,166 $ 59,415
----------------------------------------------------


2010 As at December 31


(unaudited) TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian (Papua New
dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Assets
Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ - $ 8,569 $ 326,425
Other current assets 890 282,142 686 540,371
Restricted cash - - - 70,059
Property, plant and
equipment - - 574,215 1,921,843
Investments in equity
securities - - - 2,694
Held to maturity
investments - - - 318,615
Goodwill - - - 76,368
Other non-current assets - - - 6,201
----------------------------------------------------
$ 890 $ 282,142 $ 583,470 $ 3,262,576
----------------------------------------------------


Liabilities
Current liabilities $ 14,498 $ 102,447 $ 7,940 $ 255,558
Long-term debt - - - 16,619
Asset retirement
obligations 5,381 - - 108,592
Other liabilities - - - 28,123
Future income tax
liabilities - - - 95,200
----------------------------------------------------
$ 19,879 $ 102,447 $ 7,940 $ 504,092
----------------------------------------------------


2009 As at December 31
CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian
dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Assets
Cash and short-term
investments $ 251,570 $ 158,631 $ 10,039 $ 66,314
Other current assets 14,504 42,356 73,501 49,882
Restricted cash 16,492 - 56,878 1,854
Property, plant and
equipment 920 119,669 1,013,490 66,217
Investments in equity
securities 42,411 - - -
Held to maturity
investments 89,891 - - -
Other non-current assets 1,720 248 3,554 -
----------------------------------------------------
$ 417,508 $ 320,904 $ 1,157,462 $ 184,267
----------------------------------------------------


Liabilities
Current liabilities $ 22,416 $ 32,348 $ 29,173 $ 27,665
Long-term debt 18,094 - 181,932 -
Asset retirement
obligations 28,606 8,805 44,291 15,293
Derivatives - - - -
Other liabilities 4,714 5,541 20,019 -
Future income tax
liabilities 4,240 2,024 196 9,897
Non-controlling interest - - 78,005 -
----------------------------------------------------
$ 78,070 $ 48,718 $ 353,616 $ 52,855
----------------------------------------------------


2009 As at December 31
TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of Canadian (Papua New
dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Assets
Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ 36,631 $ 10,728 $ 533,913
Other current assets 24,030 61,943 468 266,684
Restricted cash - 26,365 - 101,589
Property, plant and
equipment 19,376 103,693 537,251 1,860,616
Investments in equity
securities - - - 42,411
Held to maturity
investments - - - 89,891
Other non-current assets - 3,523 - 9,045
----------------------------------------------------
$ 43,406 $ 232,155 $ 548,447 $ 2,904,149
----------------------------------------------------


Liabilities
Current liabilities $ 19,862 $ 48,981 $ 10,855 $ 191,300
Long-term debt - - - 200,026
Asset retirement
obligations 8,497 39,546 - 145,038
Derivatives - 3,165 - 3,165
Other liabilities - 1,839 - 32,113
Future income tax
liabilities - - - 16,357
Non-controlling interest - - - 78,005
----------------------------------------------------
$ 28,359 $ 93,531 $ 10,855 $ 666,004
----------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated statements of earnings
(unaudited)


Three Months Ended Year Ended
December 31 December 31
(thousands of
Canadian dollars
except per share Note
amounts) reference 2010 2009 2010 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gross sales $ 318,128 $ 290,570 $1,098,087 $ 983,885


Smelter processing
charges and freight (38,440) (53,696) (166,754) (176,432)


Cost of sales (98,625) (74,995) (345,764) (311,432)


Depreciation (23,361) (17,911) (81,844) (61,752)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


157,702 143,968 503,725 434,269


Corporate development
and exploration (3,975) (2,915) (12,036) (10,837)


General and
administration (4,767) (9,836) (20,638) (23,892)


Investment and other
income 14 50,331 280 35,416 9,131


Asset impairment - (3,496) - (9,915)


Stand-by costs - - (6,753) -


Interest expense (2,520) (496) (6,873) (1,977)


Capital tax expense (127) 69 (373) (925)


Income tax expense 15 (54,180) (38,668) (134,682) (120,854)


Non-controlling
interest 2,041 857 1,112 (5,831)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Net income $ 144,505 $ 89,763 $ 358,898 $ 269,169
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Basic net income per
common share 16 $ 2.53 $ 1.60 $ 6.37 $ 5.14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diluted net income
per common share 16 $ 2.53 $ 1.60 $ 6.35 $ 5.13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Weighted average
shares outstanding
(000's) 57,053 56,107 56,345 52,334
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see accompanying notes)


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Segmented statements of earnings
(unaudited)


2010 For the year
ended December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Gross sales $ - $ 312,723 $ 128,643 $ 233,481
Smelter processing
charges and freight - (71,810) (298) (53,685)
Cost of sales (2,018) (86,249) (63,113) (55,831)
Depreciation - (12,212) (22,613) (7,678)
--------------------------------------------------------
(2,018) 142,452 42,619 116,287


Corporate
development and
exploration (7,340) (700) - (3,996)
General and
administration (20,638) - - -
Investment and other
income 36,815 (385) (423) -
Stand-by costs - - (6,753) -
Interest expense (1,766) - (5,107) -
Capital tax expense (373) - - -
Income tax (expense)
recovery (7,522) (32,379) 3,894 (27,868)
Non-controlling
interest - - 1,112 -
--------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) ($2,842) $ 108,988 $ 35,342 $ 84,423
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2010 For the year
ended December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Gross sales $ 73,826 $ 349,414 $ - $ 1,098,087
Smelter processing
charges and freight (4,526) (36,435) - (166,754)
Cost of sales (42,849) (95,704) - (345,764)
Depreciation (10,850) (28,491) - (81,844)
-------------------------------------------------------
15,601 188,784 - 503,725


Corporate
development and
exploration - - - (12,036)
General and
administration - - - (20,638)
Investment and other
income (514) (77) - 35,416
Stand-by costs - - - (6,753)
Interest expense - - - (6,873)
Capital tax expense - - - (373)
Income tax (expense)
recovery - (70,807) - (134,682)
Non-controlling
interest - - - 1,112
-------------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $ 15,087 $ 117,900 $ - $ 358,898
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year
ended December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Gross sales $ - $ 305,091 $ - $ 184,991
Smelter processing
charges and freight - (82,126) - (50,896)
Cost of sales (7,594) (85,888) - (62,643)
Depreciation - (13,348) - (8,220)
--------------------------------------------------------
(7,594) 123,729 - 63,232


Corporate
development and
exploration (6,131) (1,458) - (3,248)
General and
administration (23,892) - - -
Investment and other
income (9,229) 631 20,861 (420)
Asset impairment
charges - (9,915) - -
Interest expense (1,977) - - -
Capital tax expense (925) - - -
Income tax expense (27,042) (19,788) (5,595) (12,016)
Non-controlling
interest - - (5,831) -
--------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) ($76,790) $ 93,199 $ 9,435 $ 47,548
--------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year
ended December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Gross sales $ 199,879 $ 293,924 $ - $ 983,885
Smelter processing
charges and freight (13,740) (29,670) - (176,432)
Cost of sales (64,852) (90,455) - (311,432)
Depreciation (16,642) (23,542) - (61,752)
------------------------------------------------------
104,645 150,257 - 434,269


Corporate
development and
exploration - - - (10,837)
General and
administration - - - (23,892)
Investment and other
income 677 (3,389) - 9,131
Asset impairment
charges - - - (9,915)
Interest expense - - - (1,977)
Capital tax expense - - - (925)
Income tax expense - (56,413) - (120,854)
Non-controlling
interest - - - (5,831)
------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) $ 105,322 $ 90,455 $ - $ 269,169
------------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Segmented statements of earnings
(unaudited)


2010 For the three
months ended
December 31
CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Gross sales $ - $ 68,694 $ 66,794 $ 72,780
Smelter processing
charges and freight - (14,593) (271) (13,876)
Cost of sales (495) (20,297) (32,233) (15,221)
Depreciation - (2,051) (12,285) (2,041)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
(495) 31,753 22,005 41,642


Corporate
development and
exploration (2,619) (249) - (1,107)
General and
administration (4,767) - - -
Investment and other
income 52,635 (1,335) (892) -
Interest expense (454) - (2,066) -
Capital tax expense (127) - - -
Income tax (expense)
recovery (6,878) (10,646) 192 (10,968)
Non-controlling
interest - - 2,041 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) $ 37,295 $ 19,523 $ 21,280 $ 29,567
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2010 For the three
months ended
December 31
TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Gross sales $ 1,756 $ 108,104 $ - $ 318,128
Smelter processing
charges and freight - (9,700) - (38,440)
Cost of sales (8,513) (21,866) - (98,625)
Depreciation (28) (6,956) - (23,361)
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
(6,785) 69,582 - 157,702


Corporate
development and
exploration - - - (3,975)
General and
administration - - - (4,767)
Investment and other
income (33) (44) - 50,331
Interest expense - - - (2,520)
Capital tax expense - - - (127)
Income tax (expense)
recovery - (25,880) - (54,180)
Non-controlling
interest - - - 2,041
------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) ($6,818) $ 43,658 $ - $ 144,505
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three
months ended
December 31
CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)


Gross sales $ - $ 113,747 $ - $ 59,747
Smelter processing
charges and freight - (27,032) - (17,094)
Cost of sales (6,193) (25,339) - (16,564)
Depreciation - (3,522) - (1,983)
-------------------------------------------------------
(6,193) 57,854 - 24,106


Corporate development
and exploration (1,550) (487) - (878)
General and
administration (9,836) - - -
Investment and other
income 1,569 (191) (1,041) 1
Asset impairment
charges - (3,496) - -
Interest expense (496) - - -
Capital tax expense 69 - - -
Income tax (expense)
recovery (4,654) (12,516) 2,354 (5,372)
Non-controlling
interest - - 857 -
-------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) ($21,091) $ 41,164 $ 2,170 $ 17,857
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three
months ended
December 31
TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)


Gross sales $ 41,203 $ 75,873 $ - $ 290,570
Smelter processing
charges and freight (2,750) (6,820) - (53,696)
Cost of sales (11,899) (15,000) - (74,995)
Depreciation (6,521) (5,885) - (17,911)
------------------------------------------------------
20,033 48,168 - 143,968


Corporate development
and exploration - - - (2,915)
General and
administration - - - (9,836)
Investment and other
income 32 (90) - 280
Asset impairment
charges - - - (3,496)
Interest expense - - - (496)
Capital tax expense - - - 69
Income tax (expense)
recovery - (18,480) - (38,668)
Non-controlling
interest - - - 857
------------------------------------------------------


Net income (loss) $ 20,065 $ 29,598 $ - $ 89,763
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated statements of cash flows
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
December 31 Year Ended December 31
(thousands of Note
Canadian dollars) reference 2010 2009 2010 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in)
operating
activities (1)


Net income $ 144,505 $ 89,763 $ 358,898 $ 269,169
Add (deduct) items
not affecting
cash:
Depreciation 23,361 17,911 81,844 61,752
Future income tax 8,051 (2,393) (7,087) 14,353
Accretion expense
on asset
retirement
obligations and
capital leases 2,301 889 7,128 4,544
Non-controlling
interest (2,041) (857) (1,112) 5,831
Asset impairment - 3,496 - 9,915
Foreign exchange
loss (gain) 568 4,874 22,421 (1,023)
Gain on
recognition of
foreign currency
forward contract
settlement - - - (35,615)
Loss on
recognition of
interest rate
swap contract
settlement - - - 14,823
Increase in asset
retirement
obligations at
closed
properties 10 7,803 5,672 7,803 5,672
Gain on
disposition of
equity
securities (50,280) - (50,280) -
Other 2,820 (469) 9,448 10,339
Settlement of
asset retirement
obligations (3,621) (1,565) (9,719) (6,414)
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 3 1,865 8,460 (10,011) (30,595)
------------------------------------------------
135,332 125,781 409,333 322,751
------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in)
investing
activities


Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment (63,343) (63,353) (143,963) (268,264)
Acquisition of
non-controlling
interest in Las
Cruces 2 (150,600) - (150,600) -
Funding received
under Cobre
Panama option
agreement 4,065 3,425 14,427 3,425
Purchase of held
to maturity
investments 8 - - (295,846) (100,000)
Maturing of held
to maturity
investments 26,097 - 26,097 -
Sale of equity
securities 14 61,827 - 61,827 -
Sale (purchase) of
short-term
investments (7,296) (29) 19,700 8,678
Sale of assets -
Troilus 348 - 5,850 -
Other (842) - (842) -
------------------------------------------------
(129,744) (59,957) (463,350) (356,161)
------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in)
financing
activities


Long-term debt
repayments - - - (314,603)
Issuance of common
shares - - - 334,284
Funding by non-
controlling
shareholder - 1,398 2,835 51,015
Financial
assurance
deposits 2,166 (11,539) 944 (63,357)
Dividends paid on
common shares (5,600) (5,612) (11,210) (10,440)
Settlement of
interest rate
swap contract - - - (15,982)
Subsidies received 578 - 938 70,939
Other (579) (541) (2,779) (1,882)
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
(3,435) (16,294) (9,272) 49,974
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency (13,927) (12,271) (31,646) (46,706)
------------------------------------------------


Reclassification
of our share of
Ok Tedi cash to
assets held for
sale 6 (92,853) - (92,853) -
------------------------------------------------


Increase
(decrease) in
cash (104,627) 37,259 (187,788) (30,142)


Cash:
Beginning of
period 423,756 469,658 506,917 537,059
------------------------------------------------
End of period 319,129 506,917 319,129 506,917


Short-term
investments 7,296 26,996 7,296 26,996
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-
term investments $ 326,425 $ 533,913 $ 326,425 $ 533,913
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see accompanying
notes)


(1) Supplementary
cash flow
information:


Cash interest
paid $ - $ - $ 1,146 $ 10,867
Cash taxes paid $ 32,362 $ 20,192 $ 129,928 $ 38,020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Segmented statements of cash flows
(unaudited)


2010 For the year
ended December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ (33,475) $ 118,705 $ 60,636 $ 94,656
Net change in non-
cash working
capital (11,585) (1,867) (1,157) (14,550)
--------------------------------------------------------
(45,060) 116,838 59,479 80,106
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment (222) (14,911) (23,978) (3,974)
Acquisition of non-
controlling
interest in Las
Cruces (150,600)
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - - -
Purchase of held to
maturity
investments (228,500) (67,346) - -
Maturing of held to
maturity
investments 26,097 - - -
Sale of equity
investments 61,827 - - -
Sale (purchase) of
short-term
investments 26,996 - (7,296) -
Sale of assets - - - -
Other (842) - - -
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
(265,244) (82,257) (31,274) (3,974)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in) financing
activities (11,919) - 13,201 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (9,954) (2,768) (14,388)


Reclassification of
Ok Tedi cash to
assets held for
sale - - - -
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) 150,833 (75,508) 3,893 (31,002)
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash (171,390) (50,881) 42,531 30,742
Cash:
Beginning of period 224,574 158,631 10,039 66,314
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period 53,184 107,750 52,570 97,056
Short-term
investments - - 7,296 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ 53,184 $ 107,750 $ 59,866 $ 97,056
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2010 For the year
ended December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ 30,614 $ 148,208 $ - $ 419,344
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 12,941 6,207 - (10,011)
--------------------------------------------------------
43,555 154,415 - 409,333
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment - (16,344) (84,534) (143,963)
Acquisition of non-
controlling
interest in Las
Cruces (150,600)
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - 14,427 14,427
Purchase of held to
maturity
investments - - - (295,846)
Maturing of held to
maturity
investments - - - 26,097
Sale of equity
investments - - - 61,827
Sale (purchase) of
short-term
investments - - - 19,700
Sale of assets 5,850 - - 5,850
Other - - - (842)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
5,850 (16,344) (70,107) (463,350)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in) financing
activities - (10,554) - (9,272)
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (4,177) (359) (31,646)


Reclassification of
Ok Tedi cash to
assets held for
sale - (92,853) - (92,853)
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (49,405) (67,118) 68,307 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash - (36,631) (2,159) (187,788)
Cash:
Beginning of period - 36,631 10,728 506,917
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period - - 8,569 319,129
Short-term
investments - - - 7,296
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ - $ 8,569 $ 326,425
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year
ended December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ (58,561) $ 109,148 $ - $ 59,423
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 1,634 (12,846) - 2,017
--------------------------------------------------------
(56,927) 96,302 - 61,440
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment (304) (14,855) (138,769) (7,870)
Purchase of long-
term investments (100,000) - - -
Funding received
under Cobre Panama
option agreement - - -
Purchase of short-
term investments 8,678 - - -
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
(91,626) (14,855) (138,769) (7,870)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in) financing
activities 323,524 - (261,874) -
--------------------------------------------------------
Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (25,418) (1,219) (8,757)
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (155,961) (90,279) 377,920 (44,475)
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash 19,010 (34,250) (23,942) 338
Cash:
Beginning of period 205,564 192,881 33,981 65,976
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period 224,574 158,631 10,039 66,314
Short-term
investments 26,996 - - -
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ 251,570 $ 158,631 $ 10,039 $ 66,314
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the year
ended December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ 119,404 $ 123,932 $ - $ 353,346
Net change in non-
cash working
capital (830) (20,570) - (30,595)
--------------------------------------------------------
118,574 103,362 - 322,751
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment - (21,236) (85,230) (268,264)
Purchase of long-
term investments - - - (100,000)
Funding received
under Cobre Panama
option agreement - - 3,425 3,425
Purchase of short-
term investments - - - 8,678
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
- (21,236) (81,805) (356,161)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash provided by
(used in) financing
activities - (11,676) - 49,974
--------------------------------------------------------
Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (10,270) (1,042) (46,706)
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (118,574) (61,096) 92,465 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash - (916) 9,618 (30,142)
Cash:
Beginning of period - 37,547 1,110 537,059
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period - 36,631 10,728 506,917
Short-term
investments - - - 26,996
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ 36,631 $ 10,728 $ 533,913
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Segmented statements of cash flows
(unaudited)


2010 For the three
months ended
December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ (9,430) $ 19,766 $ 35,141 $ 33,074
Net change in non-
cash working
capital (2,767) 22,612 (1,215) (6,460)
--------------------------------------------------------
(12,197) 42,378 33,926 26,614
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment (90) (6,682) (31,812) (710)
Acquisition of non-
controlling
interest in Las
Cruces (150,600) - - -
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - - -
Maturing of Held to
maturity
investments 26,097 - - -
Sale of short-term
investments - - (7,296) -
Sale of equity
investments 61,827 - - -
Other (842) - - -
--------------------------------------------------------
(63,608) (6,682) (39,108) (710)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash used in
financing
activities (5,810) - 11,641 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (3,398) (2,812) (4,660)


Reclassification of
Ok Tedi cash to
assets held for
sale - - - -
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (12,182) 373 (1,389) (3,018)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash (93,797) 32,671 2,258 18,226
Cash:
Beginning of period 146,981 75,079 50,312 78,830
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period 53,184 107,750 52,570 97,056
Short-term
investments - - 7,296 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ 53,184 $ 107,750 $ 59,866 $ 97,056
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2010 For the three
months ended
December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ (855) $ 55,771 $ - $ 133,467
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 649 (10,954) - 1,865
--------------------------------------------------------
(206) 44,817 - 135,332
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment - (4,481) (19,568) (63,343)
Acquisition of non-
controlling
interest in Las
Cruces - - - (150,600)
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - 4,065 4,065
Maturing of Held to
maturity
investments - - - 26,097
Sale of short-term
investments - - - (7,296)
Sale of equity
investments - - - 61,827
Other 348 - - (494)
--------------------------------------------------------
348 (4,481) (15,503) (129,744)
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash used in
financing
activities - (9,266) - (3,435)
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (2,686) (371) (13,927)


Reclassification of
Ok Tedi cash to
assets held for
sale - (92,853) - (92,853)
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (142) (364) 16,722 -
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash - (64,833) 848 (104,627)
Cash:
Beginning of period - 64,833 7,721 423,756
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period - - 8,569 319,129
Short-term
investments - - - 7,296
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ - $ 8,569 $ 326,425
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three
months ended
December 31


CORPORATE CAYELI LAS CRUCES PYHASALMI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) (Turkey) (Spain) (Finland)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ (8,729) $ 48,435 $ - $ 21,537
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 687 2,766 - (5,992)
--------------------------------------------------------
(8,042) 51,201 - 15,545
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment (26) (4,224) (30,622) (2,047)
Purchase of short-
term investments (29) - - -
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - - -
--------------------------------------------------------
(55) (4,224) (30,622) (2,047)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------
Cash used in
financing
activities (5,677) - (10,906) -
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (4,906) (488) (3,295)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) 85,411 (939) (1,018) (34,552)
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash 71,637 41,132 (43,034) (24,349)
Cash:
Beginning of period 152,937 117,499 53,073 90,663
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period 224,574 158,631 10,039 66,314
Short-term
investments 26,996 - - -
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ 251,570 $ 158,631 $ 10,039 $ 66,314
--------------------------------------------------------


2009 For the three
months ended
December 31


TROILUS OK TEDI COBRE PANAMA TOTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(thousands of (Papua New
Canadian dollars) (Canada) Guinea) (Panama)
Cash provided by
(used in) operating
activities
Before net change
in non-cash
working capital $ 23,291 $ 32,787 $ - $ 117,321
Net change in non-
cash working
capital 1,665 9,334 - 8,460
--------------------------------------------------------
24,956 42,121 - 125,781
--------------------------------------------------------
Cash provided by
(used in) investing
activities
Purchase of
property, plant
and equipment - (11,329) (15,105) (63,353)
Purchase of short-
term investments - - - (29)
Funding received-
Cobre Panama
option agreement - - 3,425 3,425
--------------------------------------------------------
- (11,329) (11,680) (59,957)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------
Cash used in
financing
activities - 289 - (16,294)
--------------------------------------------------------


Foreign exchange
change on cash
held in foreign
currency - (2,658) (924) (12,271)
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------


Intergroup funding
(distributions) (24,956) (42,872) 18,926 -
--------------------------------------------------------


Increase (decrease)
in cash - (14,449) 6,322 37,259
Cash:
Beginning of period - 51,080 4,406 469,658
--------------------------------------------------------
End of period - 36,631 10,728 506,917
Short-term
investments - - - 26,996
--------------------------------------------------------


Cash and short-term
investments $ - $ 36,631 $ 10,728 $ 533,913
--------------------------------------------------------


INMET MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated statements of retained earnings
(unaudited)


Three Months Ended Year Ended
Dec 31 Dec 31
(thousands of
Canadian dollars) 2010 2009 2010 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Retained earnings,
beginning of
period $1,750,586 $1,457,652 $1,541,803 $1,283,074
Net income 144,505 89,763 358,898 269,169
Dividends on
common shares (5,600) (5,612) (11,210) (10,440)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained earnings,
end of period $1,889,491 $1,541,803 $1,889,491 $1,541,803
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see accompanying
notes)


Consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss)
(unaudited)


Three Months Ended Year Ended
Dec 31 Dec 31
(thousands of Note
Canadian dollars) reference 2010 2009 2010 2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Net income $ 144,505 $ 89,763 $ 358,898 $ 269,169
------------------------------------------------


Other
comprehensive
income (loss) for
the period:
Changes in fair
value of gold
forward sales
contracts (435) (1,404) (1,372) (3,284)
Changes in fair
value of
interest rate
swap contracts - - 3,903
Changes in fair
value of
investments 7,855 14,214 21,168 24,601
Currency
translation
adjustments (83,239) (58,206) (173,593) (233,004)
Reclassification
to net income of
gains/losses
realized:
Gain on
disposition of
equity
investments (50,280) - (50,280) -
Amortization of
gain on foreign
exchange forward
contracts - - - (5,657)
Recognition of
gain on foreign
exchange forward
contract - - - (28,158)
Recognition of
loss on interest
rate swap
contract - - - 11,711
Foreign exchange
loss on
reduction of net
investment in
self-sustaining
foreign
operations 14 - 3,649 22,656 1,176
Income tax expense
related to other
comprehensive
income 17 6,303 (1,960) 5,278 3,725
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
(119,796) (43,707) (176,143) (224,987)
------------------------------------------------


Comprehensive
income $ 24,709 $ 46,056 $ 182,755 $ 44,182
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(see accompanying notes)


1. Significant accounting policies


Our interim consolidated financial statements do not include all of the disclosure required for annual financial statements under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These statements do, however, follow the same accounting policies and methods of application used in our most recent annual consolidated financial statements. You should read our interim statements in conjunction with our annual statements, which you can find in our 2009 Annual Report.


These statements have been approved by Inmet's board of directors and have been reviewed by our external auditors.


2. Acquisition


On December 15, 2010, we acquired Leucadia National Corporation's (Leucadia's) 30 percent indirect equity interest and subordinated sponsor loans in Las Cruces for total value of $496.9 million. The purchase consideration was comprised of $150.6 million cash and the issuance of 5.4 million Inmet common shares. In addition, Leucadia was released from its guarantee of US $72 million debt owed by Las Cruces to an affiliate of Inmet as a result of the re-financing of its project facility in 2009.


The tables below show the fair value of the assets we acquired and the liabilities we assumed on the date of acquisition based on the consideration paid.


We recognized goodwill of $76.4 million as a result of the requirement to record future income tax liabilities calculated as the difference between the tax effect of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired and their tax bases. This goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes and has been allocated to the Las Cruces segment.


We have included 70 percent of Las Cruces' earnings in our consolidated statement of earnings to December 15, 2010 and 100 percent thereafter.


3. Statement of cash flows


The following tables show the components of our net change in non-cash working capital by segment.


4. Cash and short-term investments


5. Restricted cash


6. Sale of our interest in Ok Tedi


On December 2, 2010, we reached an agreement with Ok Tedi Mining Limited for it to repurchase our 18 percent equity interest in Ok Tedi for US $335 million. Our net proceeds after withholding taxes in Papua New Guinea were US $307 million. The transaction closed on January 28, 2011. At December 31, 2010, we have recognized our interest in Ok Tedi as held for sale.


The table below shows the components of our assets held for sale relating to Ok Tedi at December 31, 2010:


The table below shows the components of our liabilities associated with assets held for sale relating to Ok Tedi at December 31, 2010:


7. Investments in equity securities


8. Held to maturity investments


In 2010, we purchased $229 million of long-term Canadian and Provincial government bonds, Cayeli purchased $67 million of US Treasury bonds, and bonds with a face value of $26.1 million matured and were converted to cash. The bonds, with credit ratings of A to AAA, mature between February 2011 and December 2015 and have a weighted average annual yield to maturity of 2.0 percent. We have designated these bonds as held to maturity, measuring them initially at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost.


9. Long-term debt


On December 15, 2010, we acquired Leucadia's portion of these loans for $173.7 million, eliminating these loans from our consolidated balance sheet (note 2). Prior to this, we classified Leucadia's portion of the advances as long-term debt.


10. Asset retirement obligations


In 2010, we recorded additional liabilities at Las Cruces of $5.7 million mainly as a result of mining and pit development activities during the year. We also recognized additional liabilities at Pyhasalmi of $5.7 million mainly as a result of a change in our mine waste and tailings reclamation approach.


In 2010, we concluded operations at Troilus and this operation is accounted for as a closed site. We recognized additional liabilities of $7.8 million at Troilus mainly for environmental monitoring, owner and other closure costs.


11. Commitments


12. Subscription agreement with Temasek Holdings


On March 31, 2010, we entered into a subscription agreement with a subsidiary of Temasek Holdings (Private) Limited (Temasek), under which Temasek agreed to buy 9.26 million subscription receipts at a price of $54.0049 each, exchangeable on a one-for-one basis for Inmet common shares, for total proceeds of $500 million.


On December 23, 2010, the agreement was amended such that each subscription receipt will now be exchangeable for 0.840283 of an Inmet common share, representing a subscription price per Inmet common share of $64.2699, or a 15 percent discount to the five day volume-weighted average price of Inmet common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange as at December 22, 2010. The subscription receipts will now be automatically exchanged no later than 150 days after the coming into effect of legislation to amend the Code as described below. Upon exchange of the subscription receipts, Inmet's issued and outstanding shares will increase to 69.3 million common shares. Temasek will receive 7.78 million Inmet common shares, that would represent approximately 11.2 percent of Inmet's issued and outstanding common shares at that time, on a non-diluted basis.


The subscription receipts are exchangeable into Inmet common shares, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the coming into effect of legislation passed by the legislative assembly of the Republic of Panama amending Panama's Mineral Resources Code (the "Code") to permit entities in which foreign governmental bodies or authorities have an interest to hold direct or indirect interests in mining concessions in Panama.


Inmet and Temasek have also amended the investor rights agreement previously executed between them that will take effect upon exchange of the subscription receipts for common shares. Under the amended investor rights agreements, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, Temasek and members of its group will now be permitted to divest their Inmet common shares (or economic interest therein), or increase their ownership of Inmet common shares, after a period of four months following the exchange of the subscription receipts for Inmet common shares.


The subscription receipt proceeds will remain in escrow pending exchange of the subscription receipts for common shares. On completion of the exchange, the escrowed funds will be released to Inmet and the proceeds will be used by Inmet for the development of its Cobre Panama project and for general corporate purposes.


The legislation to amend the Code passed final reading in the Panamanian Assembly and came into effect in February 2011. We expect to exchange the Temasek subscription receipts for common shares before June 30, 2011.


13. Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL)


The table below shows the components of the beginning and ending balances of AOCL.


The table below shows the breakdown of the currency translation adjustments included in AOCL.


The Canadian dollar to US dollar exchange rate was $0.99 at December 31, 2010 and $1.05 at December 31, 2009. The Canadian dollar to euro exchange rate was $1.33 at December 31, 2010 and $1.50 at December 31, 2009.


14. Investment and other income


On November 12, 2010 we sold our 9.5 million shares of Premier Gold Mines Ltd. for cash proceeds of $61.4 million.


15. Income tax expense


16. Net income per share


17. Income tax recovery (expense) included in other comprehensive income


18. Subsequent event


On January 12, 2011, we entered into an arrangement agreement with Lundin Mining Corporation (Lundin) to merge, and create Symterra Corporation (Symterra), an international copper producer.


The proposed merger will be effected by way of a Plan of Arrangement completed under the Canada Business Corporations Act. It will feature a common share exchange through which Inmet common shareholders will receive 3.4918 common shares of the merged company for each common share of Inmet they own and Lundin common shareholders will receive 0.3333 common shares of the merged company for each common share of Lundin they own. The exchange ratio represents no premium to either party based on the 30 day volume weighted average price on the Toronto Stock Exchange for each of Inmet and Lundin to January 11, 2011.


Inmet and Lundin shareholders must both approve the proposed merger by two thirds of the votes cast at special shareholder meetings held to consider it. The joint information circular was mailed to shareholders on February 18, 2011. The shareholder meetings will be held on March 14, 2011.


The arrangement agreement includes customary reciprocal deal protections. Each party has agreed not to solicit any alternative transactions, and furthermore has agreed to pay the other a break fee of $120 million in certain circumstances. In addition, each company has granted the other a right to match any competing offer.


View the original article here